Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rules of conflict for a world war
Jerusalemost ^

Posted on 07/08/2005 12:00:16 PM PDT by Happy2BMe

The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition

Rules of conflict for a world war



The multiple, simultaneous explosions that took place today on the London transportation system were the work of perpetrators who had an operational capacity of considerable scope. They have come a long way since the two attacks of the year 1998 against the American embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam, and the aircraft actions of September 11, 2001.

There was careful planning, intelligence gathering, and a sophisticated choice of timing as well as near-perfect execution. We are faced with a deadly and determined adversary who will stop at nothing and will persevere as long as he exists as a fighting terrorist force.

One historical irony: I doubt whether the planners knew that one of the target areas, that in Russell Square, was within a stone's throw of a building that served as the first headquarters of the World Zionist Organization that preceded the State of Israel.

It was at 77 Great Russell Street that Dr. Chaim Weizmann, a renowned chemist, presided over the effort that culminated in the issuing of the Balfour Declaration, the first international recognition of the right of the Jewish people to a national home in what was then still a part of the Ottoman Empire.

We are in the throes of a world war, raging over the entire globe and characterized by the absence of lines of conflict and an easily identifiable enemy. There are sometimes long pauses between one attack and another, consequently creating the wrong impression that the battle is all over, or at least in the process of being won.

Generally speaking, the populations at large are not involved in the conflict, and by and large play the role of bystanders. But once in a while, these innocents are caught up in the maelstrom and suffer the most cruel and wicked of punishments meted out by those who are not bound by any rules of conduct or any norms of structured society. For a while, too short a while, we are engrossed with the sheer horror of what we see and hear, but, with the passage of time, our memories fade and we return to our daily lives, forgetting that the war is still raging out there and more strikes are sure to follow.

It cannot be said that seven years after this war broke out in east Africa, we can see its conclusion. We are in for the long haul and we must brace ourselves for more that will follow. The 'Great Wars' of the 20th century lasted less than this war has already lasted, and the end is nowhere in sight.

There will be supreme tests of leadership in this unique situation and people will have to trust the wisdom and good judgment of those chosen to govern them. The executives must be empowered to act resolutely and to take every measure necessary to protect the citizens of their country and to carry the combat into whatever territory the perpetrators and their temporal and spiritual leaders are inhabiting.

The rules of combat must be rapidly adjusted to cater to the necessities of this new and unprecedented situation, and international law must be rewritten in such a way as to permit civilization to defend itself. Anything short of this invites disaster and must not be allowed to happen.

The aim of the enemy is not to defeat western civilization but to destroy its sources of power and existence, and to render it a relic of the past. It does not seek a territorial victory or a regime change; it wants to turn western civilization into history and will stop at nothing less than that.

It will show no mercy or compassion and no appreciation for these noble values when practiced by us. This does not mean that we can or should assume the norms of our adversaries, nor that we should act indiscriminately. It does mean that the only way to ensure our safety and security will be to obtain the destruction, the complete destruction, of the enemy.

MUCH HAS been said in recent years about the vital need for international cooperation. There is no doubt that this is essential. Yet no measure of this will suffice and it cannot replace the requirement that each and every country effectively declare itself at war with international Islamist terror and recruit the public to involve itself actively in the battle, under the direction of the legal powers that be.

In the past, governments have been expected to provide security to their citizens. The responsibility is still there, in principle. But in practice, no government today can provide an effective 'suit of protection' for the ordinary citizen. There can be no protection for every bus, every train, every street, every square. In these times the ordinary citizen must be vigilant and must make his personal contribution to the war effort. Private enterprise will have to supplement the national effort in many walks of life.

The measures that I have outlined above will not be easily adopted
overnight. When the US entered World War Two, Congress approved the momentous decision by a majority of one vote. Profound cultural changes will have to come about and the democratic way of life will be hard-pressed to produce solutions that will enable the executive branch to perform its duties and, at the same time, to preserve the basic tenets of our democratic way of life. It will not be easy, but it will be essential not to lose sight of every one of these necessities.

This war is already one of the longest in modern times; as things appear now, it is destined to be part of our daily lives for many years to come, until the enemy is eliminated, as it surely will be.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: israel; jeruselum; war; worldwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: republican2005

Not necessary to withdraw. The Geneva Convention only protects combatants in uniform who do not wilfully attack civilians or hide among them. The jihadists from the Religion of Murder are not protected.


21 posted on 07/08/2005 1:01:50 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

What makes you think that would end it? What would be your target?


22 posted on 07/08/2005 1:03:47 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
if that's true they what is all the fuss about the prisoners at gitmo?

I dont understand. If they aren't entitled to any rights under the Geneva convention then what's all the fuss about.

Obviously there is some room for interpretation that needs to be clarified before we can do what's necessary to win this war.
23 posted on 07/08/2005 1:22:57 PM PDT by republican2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
there is only ONE way to win a war.

You have to destroy the enemies will to continue fighting.

This can only be accomplished by either killing them all, or killing a large enough percentage of them to make them say "enough"

By avoiding attacking civilian areas we are purposely drawing out a war that could have been over with almost no casualties on our side.

If we had reacted to 9-11 by leveling mecca, bulldozing the dome of the rock, nuking Afghanistan, Central Iraq, and North Korea, and deporting the entire Palestinian population in Israel to some god forsaken place this war would be over, and we wouldn't have lost a single man.

Once they saw that we meant business... the violence would stop. And if it didn't I just continue down the list of holy sites, leveling them one by one till they got the message.
24 posted on 07/08/2005 1:33:31 PM PDT by republican2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ArmyTeach; Who dat?

25 posted on 07/08/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
When the US entered World War Two, Congress approved the momentous decision by a majority of one vote.

That's not correct. There was only one vote cast in Congress against the declaration of war. That was by the pacifist Jeannette Rankin, Representative from Montana, and heroine to every modern day appeaser and self-hating groveler.

-ccm

26 posted on 07/08/2005 2:11:08 PM PDT by ccmay (Question Diversity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
We are in the throes of a world war

Not yet. We'll all know when it finally gets going.

27 posted on 07/08/2005 2:12:56 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

bump...


28 posted on 07/08/2005 2:29:31 PM PDT by danneskjold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
I disagree. If the muslims faced any repercussions or terror in THEIR communities, this would end very quickly.

Yeah, like how about a few suicide bombers in their packed mosques, during Friday night prayers !

Then we could just shrug OUR shoulders and say, but ALL Americans aren't like that....We are the people of Peace.

It would be great.

29 posted on 07/08/2005 3:45:54 PM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
What makes you think that would end it? What would be your target?

They derive their power from the Islamic Cult/Religion.

The Islamic Cult is target rich.

30 posted on 07/08/2005 4:54:57 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
We should abolish crap like the UN and Geneva Convention. We need to DO WHATEVER IT TAKES to win.
31 posted on 07/08/2005 4:59:55 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson