To: Dr.Hilarious
Hmmm, tax cuts equal higher revenues? Shocked, shocked i tell you!
5 posted on
07/07/2005 3:47:01 PM PDT by
icwhatudo
(The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
To: icwhatudo
I read about this a week or two ago and was wondering why the MSM weren't reporting this good economic news. Then I remembered how they covered Warren Buffett extensively when he was betting against the dollar, and I saw one story about how that wasn't a good bet a few months later.
If this were news under the Clinton Presidency, the cover of Time would read "The New Boom!"
11 posted on
07/07/2005 3:51:39 PM PDT by
Dr.Hilarious
(If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
To: icwhatudo
Hmmm, tax cuts equal higher revenues? Shocked, shocked i tell you! What "tax cuts"?
Without corresponding spending cuts, the phony "tax cuts" are simply deficits - deferred taxes to be paid later, with lots of interest piled on. Thus, an even more gigantic federal debt.
32 posted on
07/07/2005 6:15:09 PM PDT by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson