They're more concerned about being "discriminated against" then they are in condemning these attack.
Buzz
Buzz Blog
1 posted on
07/07/2005 6:34:53 AM PDT by
GPBurdell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: GPBurdell
Muslim leaders join condemnationJoin the battle, or STFU.
To: GPBurdell
If muslims cannotor will notcontrol their own radical elements, others will do it. One way or the other, it will be done.
To: GPBurdell
33 posted on
07/07/2005 6:41:49 AM PDT by
summer
To: GPBurdell
Then they ought to cough up the perpatrators, since some of them know who they are; being such a tight community and all that..
To: GPBurdell
I imagine they are celebrating in private. Talk is cheap.
36 posted on
07/07/2005 6:42:28 AM PDT by
tkathy
(Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
To: GPBurdell
Bull shit!
That is for the public.
If they had not privately consented to and probably ordered them, the attacks would not have occurred.
37 posted on
07/07/2005 6:42:47 AM PDT by
sport
To: GPBurdell
38 posted on
07/07/2005 6:43:49 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: GPBurdell
condemnation is a really pretty word but it doesn't mean a thing. It's time for them to step up to the plate and start killing the terrorist animals among them.
39 posted on
07/07/2005 6:44:05 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: GPBurdell
They're more concerned about being "discriminated against" I wonder if the Brits will fold up like a house of cards under threat from these losers.
40 posted on
07/07/2005 6:44:13 AM PDT by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: GPBurdell
"Muslim leaders have condemned the attacks on London and said they fear their communities could now fall prey to vigilante attacks." Well, I am sure they would still have the same fear of retaliatory attacks even if they supported this sick terror attack and weren't saying so publicly. To paint with a broad brush, how do we know what they are saying in their stupid mosques? The veils certainly come off then.
What the islamists learned after 911 up until very recently was that they needed to make some sort of noise in voicing displeasure with terror. But they do not need to be sincere since their very "religion" gives them license to LIE. They say one thing publicly and another is pronounced in their meeting places.
Overall, most islamic groups DO NOT voice even token opposition to terror. So, what has really changed on their end? They want to try to quell retaliatory attacks. Selfish...
To: GPBurdell; All
"I don't think there'll be as high a number of attacks as after 11 September because Muslims have come out very strongly, especially Muslim leaders, condemning the attacks.
What "high number of attacks" on Muslims is he referring to? Anyone know?
42 posted on
07/07/2005 6:44:31 AM PDT by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: GPBurdell
IMO they have good reason to fear reprisals. Common
sense tells you that such an organization has to have
embedded terrorists whose modus operandi is based on
secreting themselves inside a respected group. And
even the Honchos of the organization has to know that!
Sure, mom, kids, even Dad in a family may be pro-
peace; but what about Uncle Hassein who keeps close
touch via internet to terrorist groups back "home!" ?
It's the updated version of the WWII adage:
"We have met the enemy and he is us!"
44 posted on
07/07/2005 6:44:43 AM PDT by
Grendel9
(uick)
To: GPBurdell
If Muslims anywhere in any numbers had been acting like normal citizens, keeping their eyes open, reporting potential local terrorists to the police, etc.instead of covering up for them and hiding them, I might be sympathetic.
Islamic Terrorism has to be stopped the same way 'Mad Cow' or 'Hoof & Mouth' are stopped.
If there ain't no Muslims, there won't be no Islamic Terrorism.
So9
45 posted on
07/07/2005 6:45:02 AM PDT by
Servant of the 9
(Kill the all and let God sort them out.)
To: GPBurdell
How pathetic and predictable.
49 posted on
07/07/2005 6:46:02 AM PDT by
Jaded
(Hell sometimes has fluorescent lighting and a trumpet.)
To: GPBurdell
If they are worried about their safety from Christians they can always go to peaceful Iraq with their Muslim Cult brothers.
50 posted on
07/07/2005 6:46:17 AM PDT by
BTCM
To: SJackson; Salem; Alouette; Do not dub me shapka broham; dervish; M. Espinola; Slings and Arrows; ...
T.R.O.P. allahu fubar ping!
To: GPBurdell
Mein Kampf = Mein Koran
Allahu Akbar! = Heil Hitler!
54 posted on
07/07/2005 6:47:31 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: GPBurdell
Re:
Muslim leaders join condemnation < yawn > bullsh*t < / yawn >
55 posted on
07/07/2005 6:47:43 AM PDT by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
To: GPBurdell
"Muslim Association of Britain president Ahmed Sheikh said the attacks would make the Muslim community less safe."
Damn thats sneaky, notice he did not condemn the bombing or the loss of life, its all about the 'relationship' the Muslims have with others that is the real victim here..
57 posted on
07/07/2005 6:48:07 AM PDT by
N3WBI3
(If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a perit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
To: GPBurdell
"Muslim leaders join condemnation"
Bovine Feces.
58 posted on
07/07/2005 6:48:12 AM PDT by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson