Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Orders New York Times Reporter Jailed
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com ^ | 7 6 05 | PETE YOST

Posted on 07/06/2005 2:33:03 PM PDT by freepatriot32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: GOPJ

Shep Smith ranted and raved about this travesty. He could not believe from the emails he got, the number of people who did not get it.

Freedom of the press!! If the press is not free, we are doomed.

They were free to report Juanita Broaddrick. (She's a liar)
They were free to report on the Swifties. (They are liars)
They were free to follow up on Dan Rather's bogus memos. (Bush is a liar)
They were free to report John Kerry's lies. (We are liars)

If the press did it's job and followed a story instead pressing an agenda...I might be a little sympathetic.

The collective wringing of hands on TV tonight, even on Brit's show, is nauseating.

Hey Press!!!! Welcome to our world!


41 posted on 07/06/2005 4:00:05 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

That's exactly what I think the case is. They simply made it up and she's willing to go to jail because the alternative is to have her fraud exposed and her career ruined.


42 posted on 07/06/2005 4:05:47 PM PDT by thoughtomator (The legislative process is like the digestive process, same end product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I love it when stories have a *happy* ending.


43 posted on 07/06/2005 4:49:37 PM PDT by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
poor Judy,lets just call her butch- one tough reporter about to get her licks.

She could join Janet Reno, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi and the Beast, in the splitting hairs lifestyle.... Whom did I leave out on this scenario?

44 posted on 07/06/2005 5:07:19 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Whadda cupple of loozers. Miller's going down for the ship with Floyd Abrams whispering sweet first amendment nothings in her ear. And Cooper is making grand statements while he's avoiding being a bad man's boyfriend.

She's a misguided idiot, and he's a woosie. Hellooo democratic party, here are your persons.

45 posted on 07/06/2005 5:21:47 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: COUNTrecount
What if some of the media make up facts just to slant a story the way they want it to read

Good point, but strangely, I've always considered that lying, not slanting.

47 posted on 07/06/2005 6:06:37 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She'll be a star on "The View."


48 posted on 07/06/2005 6:09:00 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Maumee

Can't do a book deal on her incarceration in NY.. Called the Son of Sam law...


49 posted on 07/06/2005 6:27:57 PM PDT by Schwaeky ("Today a day that will live in Infamy, the Canadians have bombed the Baldwins" Thanks Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Freedom of the press does not mean freedom of reporters to disregard the laws everyone else has to follow, if doing so would help get a good scoop. They're not a special class of citizens, regardless of how much they like to think of themselves as such.
50 posted on 07/06/2005 7:20:03 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

I thought she was killed during the Desperate Housewives season.


51 posted on 07/06/2005 7:23:11 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Is it just me or does it seem yost goes out of his way to mention Bush and Cheney also testified, ala clinton?

During clinton's escapades with selling our military secrets to the chinese the msm would never mention clinton by name even though he was the main suspect. The closest a msm report would come to mentioning clinton would be, 'the clinton administration.' argh

52 posted on 07/06/2005 7:24:49 PM PDT by rvoitier (25% of traffic fatalities involve a drunk driver... We gotta get them sober people off the road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
From a New York Times column: "Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the publisher of The New York Times, said in a statement that "there are times when the greater good of our democracy demands an act of conscience." "Judy has chosen such an act in honoring her promise of confidentiality to her sources," he said. "She believes, as do we, that the free flow of information is critical to an informed citizenry.""

It is ironic, comic even, for Sulzberger to laud the importance of the free flow of information, and having an informed citizenry, but that lofty goal doesn't extend to telling us peons out here who the sources are.

53 posted on 07/06/2005 7:35:03 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@Anonymous Sources Are Sometimes Non-Existent...Just Ask Mike Barnicle.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

The Rather Theory


54 posted on 07/06/2005 7:44:08 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123

Cooper's source is Rove. Miller's source is somebody else. Rove told Cooper Wilson was recomemded by his wife. Miller got the name from somebody else - probably Wilson or Clarke.


55 posted on 07/06/2005 7:48:09 PM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Shep Smith ranted and raved about this travesty. They were free to report Juanita Broaddrick. (She's a liar) They were free to report on the Swifties. (They are liars) They were free to follow up on Dan Rather's bogus memos. (Bush is a liar) They were free to report John Kerry's lies. (We are liars)

They were free to report on Juanita Broaddrick. (But they chose to ignore her -- her truth conflicted with their delusions)

They were free to report on the Swifties. (The MSM wanted the Swifties to go away so they ignored them - and when that didn't work, they interviewed the Viet Cong to discredit them)

They were free to follow up on Dan Rather's bogus memos. (They didn't want the truth about the memos -- it conflicted with their delusions)

They were free to report John Kerry's lies. (John Kerry's lies are their lies. He has delusions of grandeur, they have delusions of grandeur.)

Is the MSM worthy of the 1st Amendment?

56 posted on 07/06/2005 7:54:03 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Freedom of the press does not mean freedom of reporters to disregard the laws everyone else has to follow, if doing so would help get a good scoop. They're not a special class of citizens, regardless of how much they like to think of themselves as such.

They're not a special class of citizen, but what they do is important for a free society. In this case, they have the option of civil disobedience -- and the privilege of going to jail for their beliefs.

57 posted on 07/06/2005 8:04:12 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

My point exactly. The "liar" comments were my abridged version of their coverage. Not my opinion . Just wanted to make that clear. LOL!


58 posted on 07/06/2005 8:15:41 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

The MSM is no longer the press envisioned by Jefferson. They have inadvertantly sacrificed their integrity for so long, that now when they invoke it, it sounds like a stage aside, a whisper to a disinterested remaining audience, their peers having gone to dine shortly after the intermission. They are in the throes of their relevancy. And now, we are haunted by the reminder that we must all now hang together or we most surely will hang separately.


59 posted on 07/06/2005 8:18:42 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Rubbish. You need to go to jail for aiding and abetting the felon who leaked confidential national security secrets, not be "shielded" from jail because someone pays you to type on a keyboard (i.e. "journalism").

You're absolutely right. First, there is no right to this in law. Other privileges (priest, doctor) are very narrow and come from British common law. Second, there is a very good argument that journalists have no right to confidential sources at all. If nobody goes on the record, then what are you doing printing it? Third, and most importantly, journalists should not be given a shield because they are no better than the rest of us. I'm a journalist here on FR and I should not be entitled to any special benefits.

60 posted on 07/06/2005 8:39:25 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson