Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Further proof, if we needed it, that Democrats have become knee-jerk obstructionists and pathological partisans. Wake up America! Stop giving Bush the low approval ratings! Give THESE EXTREMIST DEMOCRATS THE DISAPPROVAL LIKE YOU DID THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESSES OF THE 90s THAT ACTUALLY SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING UNLIKE THESE PARTISAN NITWITS IN THE DEM. PARTY WHO CARE MORE ABOUT POLITICS AND BUSH HATING AND OBSTRUCTIONISM THAN ACCOMPLISHING SOMETHING FOR AMERICA!!!
1 posted on 07/06/2005 9:01:00 AM PDT by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: MikeA

In the words of George W. Bush, "BRING IT ON"!!!


2 posted on 07/06/2005 9:04:17 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
Schumer went on to say how hard it was to predict how a Supreme Court justice would turn out: “Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only ones that resulted how they predicted were [Antonin] Scalia and [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg. So most of the time they've gotten their picks wrong, and that's what we want to do to them again.”

Wow.......intentional manipulation of the Supreme Court. Is it called treason or politics?

3 posted on 07/06/2005 9:06:15 AM PDT by ScreamingFist (Peace through Ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
The bad news is that repeating what you intercept from someone else's cell call is against federal law.

Remember the deal with McDermott and the Newt call?

4 posted on 07/06/2005 9:06:42 AM PDT by capt. norm (Rap is to music what the Etch-A-Sketch is to art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
Schumer promised a fight over whoever the President’s nominee was: “It's not about an individual judge… It's about how it affects the overall makeup of the court.”

He's right on the first point, and a lousy liar on the second. For the 'Rats, this appointment is about one thing and one thing only, abortion. They're going to pull out all the stops to keep their precious "right" to slaughter unborn children. If there is any good to come of it, it will be to see what a sham this anti-filibuster "deal" really was. The first thing the 'Rats will do it throw that dead weight overboard. They're going to filibuster any nominee who won't come right out and say that they support abortion.

5 posted on 07/06/2005 9:07:10 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Well there is the PROFF of how the DEMRATS really think about this entire nomination process? Can anyone say nuclear option?


11 posted on 07/06/2005 9:09:19 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

It makes me happy to see that Bush is waiting a short spell before naming the successor. The longer the 'Craps have to wait, the more likely they are to demonstrate their willingness to reject *anybody* Bush names.


12 posted on 07/06/2005 9:09:34 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

BTTT

copy to:
Chuckie
Lindsey
Rush
Sean
Hugh


17 posted on 07/06/2005 9:11:08 AM PDT by maica (Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

There's not even a nominee. They don't care...it's about obstruction.


18 posted on 07/06/2005 9:11:46 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA; All

If Bush nominates a 1st class original constitution constructionist and puts all the "R" in lock step, it promises to be the Democrat's waterloo.

That is IF (and it is a BIG if) the republicans find their testicles and spines.


20 posted on 07/06/2005 9:12:48 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

I phoned Graham's office. They know about this.


21 posted on 07/06/2005 9:13:03 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

WE CAN COUNT ON THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA TO HELP THE DEMOCRATS ON THIS ISSUE.


22 posted on 07/06/2005 9:13:43 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

RUSH on it right now.


23 posted on 07/06/2005 9:14:22 AM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Lucky Chucky


29 posted on 07/06/2005 9:16:27 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
I'll pick people who one, can do the job; people who are honest, people who are bright; and people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate from. That's what I campaigned on, and that's what I'm going to do."

GEORGE BUSH- Wed. July 6,2005

32 posted on 07/06/2005 9:17:56 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

34 posted on 07/06/2005 9:18:25 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
Beat you by 3 minutes... :)

Clicky!

40 posted on 07/06/2005 9:22:16 AM PDT by visagoth (If you think education is expensive - try ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

The radical left that funds them is insisting that the Democrats oppose any/all Bush nominees because they don't think he was actually elected. Twice.

So why be surprised? We knew this was coming, they have telegraphed it for going on 5 years now.


43 posted on 07/06/2005 9:27:45 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
Schumer shifted gears and called his friend and “Gang of 14” member, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. The two talked in a very friendly manner about doing an event sometime this week together.

Lindsey Graham consorting with his friends again...
45 posted on 07/06/2005 9:29:45 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

Perhaps NC, or is SC,? should scream and hollar at Graham, he is sounding way too much like McCain. EGAD.


48 posted on 07/06/2005 9:35:22 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA

I have been saying since O'Conner handed in her resignation that the 'Rats would fight virtually any nominee--up to and including Schumer (Heaven forbid) himself.


52 posted on 07/06/2005 9:44:50 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson