Further proof, if we needed it, that Democrats have become knee-jerk obstructionists and pathological partisans. Wake up America! Stop giving Bush the low approval ratings! Give THESE EXTREMIST DEMOCRATS THE DISAPPROVAL LIKE YOU DID THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESSES OF THE 90s THAT ACTUALLY SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING UNLIKE THESE PARTISAN NITWITS IN THE DEM. PARTY WHO CARE MORE ABOUT POLITICS AND BUSH HATING AND OBSTRUCTIONISM THAN ACCOMPLISHING SOMETHING FOR AMERICA!!!
1 posted on
07/06/2005 9:01:00 AM PDT by
MikeA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: MikeA
In the words of George W. Bush, "BRING IT ON"!!!
2 posted on
07/06/2005 9:04:17 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: MikeA
Schumer went on to say how hard it was to predict how a Supreme Court justice would turn out: Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only ones that resulted how they predicted were [Antonin] Scalia and [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg. So most of the time they've gotten their picks wrong, and that's what we want to do to them again. Wow.......intentional manipulation of the Supreme Court. Is it called treason or politics?
3 posted on
07/06/2005 9:06:15 AM PDT by
ScreamingFist
(Peace through Ignorance)
To: MikeA
The bad news is that repeating what you intercept from someone else's cell call is against federal law.
Remember the deal with McDermott and the Newt call?
4 posted on
07/06/2005 9:06:42 AM PDT by
capt. norm
(Rap is to music what the Etch-A-Sketch is to art.)
To: MikeA
Schumer promised a fight over whoever the Presidents nominee was: It's not about an individual judge
It's about how it affects the overall makeup of the court. He's right on the first point, and a lousy liar on the second. For the 'Rats, this appointment is about one thing and one thing only, abortion. They're going to pull out all the stops to keep their precious "right" to slaughter unborn children. If there is any good to come of it, it will be to see what a sham this anti-filibuster "deal" really was. The first thing the 'Rats will do it throw that dead weight overboard. They're going to filibuster any nominee who won't come right out and say that they support abortion.
5 posted on
07/06/2005 9:07:10 AM PDT by
chimera
To: MikeA
Well there is the PROFF of how the DEMRATS really think about this entire nomination process? Can anyone say nuclear option?
To: MikeA
It makes me happy to see that Bush is waiting a short spell before naming the successor. The longer the 'Craps have to wait, the more likely they are to demonstrate their willingness to reject *anybody* Bush names.
12 posted on
07/06/2005 9:09:34 AM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: MikeA
BTTT
copy to:
Chuckie
Lindsey
Rush
Sean
Hugh
17 posted on
07/06/2005 9:11:08 AM PDT by
maica
(Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
To: MikeA
There's not even a nominee. They don't care...it's about obstruction.
18 posted on
07/06/2005 9:11:46 AM PDT by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: MikeA; All
If Bush nominates a 1st class original constitution constructionist and puts all the "R" in lock step, it promises to be the Democrat's waterloo.
That is IF (and it is a BIG if) the republicans find their testicles and spines.
To: MikeA
I phoned Graham's office. They know about this.
21 posted on
07/06/2005 9:13:03 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(The Hillary documentary is coming)
To: MikeA
WE CAN COUNT ON THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA TO HELP THE DEMOCRATS ON THIS ISSUE.
To: MikeA
23 posted on
07/06/2005 9:14:22 AM PDT by
mware
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
To: MikeA
29 posted on
07/06/2005 9:16:27 AM PDT by
Nachum
To: MikeA
I'll pick people who one, can do the job; people who are honest, people who are bright; and people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate from. That's what I campaigned on, and that's what I'm going to do." GEORGE BUSH- Wed. July 6,2005
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
34 posted on
07/06/2005 9:18:25 AM PDT by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: MikeA
Beat you by 3 minutes... :)
Clicky!
40 posted on
07/06/2005 9:22:16 AM PDT by
visagoth
(If you think education is expensive - try ignorance)
To: MikeA
The radical left that funds them is insisting that the Democrats oppose any/all Bush nominees because they don't think he was actually elected. Twice.
So why be surprised? We knew this was coming, they have telegraphed it for going on 5 years now.
To: MikeA
Schumer shifted gears and called his friend and Gang of 14 member, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham. The two talked in a very friendly manner about doing an event sometime this week together.
Lindsey Graham consorting with his friends again...
45 posted on
07/06/2005 9:29:45 AM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: MikeA
Perhaps NC, or is SC,? should scream and hollar at Graham, he is sounding way too much like McCain. EGAD.
48 posted on
07/06/2005 9:35:22 AM PDT by
Burlem
To: MikeA
I have been saying since O'Conner handed in her resignation that the 'Rats would fight virtually any nominee--up to and including Schumer (Heaven forbid) himself.
52 posted on
07/06/2005 9:44:50 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson