Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nwrep

I know what former President Reagan would say, but I decline to raise that argument here. It seems we have a disagreement. A 'less contentious' and 'more collegial' Court is a very good goal indeed. Bush could do a lot worse. The alternative is for Congress to spend the next year or eighteen months debating your keystone issue.


3 posted on 07/05/2005 8:58:53 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ex-Texan

We have the Presidency. We have both houses of Congress. We have a majority of state governments - both governerships and legislatures (I believe). Yet a single 5-4 decision from SCOTUS can render all of that meaningless on any given issue. If the left wants a 'less contentious' and 'more collegial' Court, it is their obligation to fall in line behind us and cease their obstructionism. We have both the Constitution and the will of the people on our side.

Should we not be allowed to undo the damage that liberalism and judicial activism has wrought on this country? And if not now, then when?


19 posted on 07/05/2005 10:06:42 PM PDT by Fatalist (60 in 06 (but would it be enough even then?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson