Joe Wilson himself pointed to Rove at the start and even said he'd like to see Rove "frog-marched" off to jail.
I doubt we'll see any libel suits, but it was as false a charge then as this pathetic regurgitation was.
Suing O'Donnell would not help - it would only make him look legit. Better to point at him and laugh.
Years from now, some trivia show will be explaining the difference between O'Donnell, Baghdad Bob, and Joe Isuzu. If you're old then and can remember which one is which, that will be a good day.
Re--Now_is_The_Time: I'd like to see O'Donnell get sued for libel by Rove's attorney. This is a deliberate fabrication meant to defame a great man's reputation and character. It will make lying scum like him think twice before attacking this administration with baseless allegations in the future..
**
Why would Rove sue O'Donnell for libel? What did he fabricate? Here is what O'Donnell said:
"And I know I'm going to get pulled into the grand jury for saying this but the source of...for Matt Cooper was Karl Rove, and that will be revealed in this document dump that Time magazine's going to do with the grand jury."
and
"I revealed in yesterday's taping of the McLaughlin Group that Time magazine's e-mails will reveal that Karl Rove was Matt Cooper's source. I have known this for months but didn't want to say it at a time that would risk me getting dragged into the grand jury."
And now we discover that Mr. Luskin, Rove's lawyer, concedes that Rove is a source in Cooper's emails, but not in the original leak. So, O'Donnell just stated a fact. Where is the libel?