To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It sounds like the NYT is celebrating....."a record".
I couldn't read the whole article, because I refuse to register with the NY Slimes.
Semper Fi
2 posted on
06/25/2005 7:54:24 AM PDT by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
3 posted on
06/25/2005 7:57:46 AM PDT by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Liberals demanded equal combat role for women, then when the inevitable occurs, they use their deaths as propaganda denigrating our military.
4 posted on
06/25/2005 7:59:32 AM PDT by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Heard about this this morning.
Horrible.
Car bombs and IEDs are the terrorists' main tactics now.
6 posted on
06/25/2005 8:07:22 AM PDT by
Allegra
(But It's A Dry Heat...)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why should we be surprised? Women,children, the old,the wise the young.No discretion.Blowed away by seething undescibable evil.They hail this as courage.It will be put in their lap soon.
7 posted on
06/25/2005 8:08:27 AM PDT by
noodler
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Iraq Bombing Kills 4 U.S. Women... How is the Marines' gender relevant to this story?
Four Marines killed. That's the story. If the media is going to make gender part of the story, then do it evenhandedly. Imagine headlines to the affect, "Iraq Bombing Kills 4 U.S. Men"
Except perhaps in the most desperate of circumstances, no civilized civilization puts its women in combat.
8 posted on
06/25/2005 8:35:46 AM PDT by
Barnacle
(A human shield against the onslaught of Leftist tripe.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's certainly typical. First they campaign for equal opportunities for women in combat, and then they blame Bush when women are killed.
It's the same with blacks. They whine and bitch when black re-enlistment drops (although not below the percentage of blacks in the population). Then out of the other sides of their mouths they whine and complain because blacks are being subjected to dangerous combat.
With privelege comes responsibility. You take the job, you take the risks.
9 posted on
06/25/2005 8:39:22 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Messengers are usually exempt from reprisal for bringing bad news.
But this is the tawdry NYT.
Exemplary in their anti-American filth without exception.
This might as well be just another news outlet for AlJezeera.
To whom do we credit for such "faithful" coverage?
On the other hand constancy is considered a virtue.
Good job T_C.
10 posted on
06/25/2005 8:46:19 AM PDT by
CBart95
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sh@@heads NYT. We are at war. For a while, American deaths were on a decline. Watch now, it will inspire the terrorist to go back to killing our military since they got NYT coverage. Lets hope they just don't target women in the military. Damn the NYT. If people would just not buy the Times, we could complete the mission much sooner. In a sense, they are recruiting terrorist who love being in the news.
11 posted on
06/25/2005 9:02:07 AM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I hope Patsy Shroeder (ex. Colorado Rat congressweasel) is happy now that women are being killed in combat.
ol' hoghead
12 posted on
06/25/2005 9:02:32 AM PDT by
ol' hoghead
(never, ever go to "FREECREDITREPORT.COM. Trust me on this.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A scenario or timeline I saw earlier indicated that these women marines were on their way to relieve other women at a checkpoint because of course they had to have women there to search the local women passing through.
This establishes an MO, a pattern - and IMO these women were deliberately targeted.
18 posted on
06/25/2005 3:47:30 PM PDT by
Let's Roll
( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson