How, then, do you explain their inordinate concern with the "rights" of these "terrorists"?
I question whether they have addressed a fraction of the rhetoric and effort toward the memory of the WTC victims as they have on the issues of Abu Ghraib and Gitmo.
If they are not "pro-terrorist", they are the next thing to it. In Cold War lexicon, "fellow travellers".
Just like during the Cold War they weren't pro-communist they were anti-anti-communists. Why they didn't then or now just go with the simpler anti-American name, I just don't know.
How, then, do you explain their inordinate concern with the "rights" of these "terrorists"?
As I noted in my Post 31, because the terrorists are currently fighting against the U.S. military.
If George Bush were to strike a deal with the terrorists, the Democrats would be raging about how the terrorists should be boiled in oil.
The Democrats are not "pro" anyone or anything.
They are simply anti-America and anti-Bush.