He was probably drunk as a skunk when it all happened.
My speculation at this point is that he is an unbalanced man, and likely a malcontent. His "whistleblowing" probably has not resulted in what he'd hoped for. Frustrated, he went to go get drunk at a very nasty place. Of course, all the LANL malcontents have latched onto this and are saying "the man / the establishment / Bushites wanted to shut him up" blah,blah, blah.
Why would the pedestrian who was struck and was that pissed allow Mr. Hooks to go into the bar and drink 2 mixed drinks, allow 1 hour to pass, and then blindside him over 1 hour later. If it was rage which possessed the attacker, how could he contain his rage for that period of time? No, that is not what happened. Why was it reported that they told him to keep his mouth shut? This explaination is a canard.
Are you familiar with the Flight #800 witnesses and how the FBI didn't want to talk with anyone who said they saw the missile going upwards? My belief in our government agencies has been shattered by their own actions.
Why would you believe anything the F.B.I. says? Their
track record in the truthfulness department isnt very
good.
Hook arrived Cheeks 6:30 P.M.
Consumed six (6) beers.
Experienced "several" lap dances.
Tipped "generously".
Left at closing time Sunday morning.
Attempted to back out of parking place in Cheeks parking lot nearly backing over pedestrian.
Pedestrian and friends didn't appreciate being nearly backed over and acted out.
Zero correlation between another Sunday morning at Cheeks and whistleblowing re LANL WF&A.
Not to say LANL doesn't warrant a thorough counterintelligence reform per Notra Trulock, Code Name Kindred Spirit: Inside The Chinese Espionage Scandal, Encounter, 2003.
Not to say the FBI doesn't warrant rebuke for Richard Jewell and the Waco massacre and more.
Not to say the SFPD isn't a satire of itself with its three-car-per-traffic-stop policy.
But in this case Freud is right: the cigar is just a cigar.