Fits in perfectly with the "guilty until proven innocent" folks from Moveon.org.
If they can't even get this right, then why on earth would we believe them when they declare DeLay guilty?
"Fits in perfectly with the "guilty until proven innocent" folks from Moveon.org."
Hehehe!
What really makes what you said funny is that 'moveon' originated from wanting people to 'move on' during the Clinton scandals, particularly the Clinton trials. They encouraged juvenile delinquency back then, having underage teens wear tee-shirts saying, "I had sex with Bill Clinton", both girls and boys. That was their origin-- encouraging pedaphile slander against the president in order to normalize sexual misconduct.
Savage points out that their funder, who was secret back then, Soros, might be supporting legalized pot in order to keep the masses drugged up and more easilly duped into supporting globalist agendas. While I agree with the Constitutionality of freedom to self-medicate-- even recreationally, the timing is not exactly ideal. Perhaps we should only deregulate drug use after extending the voting age to 45. Then we won't have as many dope-heads live long enough to vote.
The cold rule: one must prove one can survive for 45 years before one can decide the country's course. We all, theoretically, have a chance of reaching that age, so in essense, no one is actually disenfranchized in the long term. Not to mention that it takes 45 years to accumlate 45 years' worth of knowledge. And frankly, naturalized citizens should be here 20 years before voting, IMHO.