Posted on 06/06/2005 11:36:04 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
I have learned to appreciate my enemies. They can be useful as indicators as to whether I am on the correct path. Once again they are making me proud. When Kerry returns to Washington he says that he is going to bring up an impeachment issue regarding the WMD falsification charges. He has a memo written by Matthew Rycroft, who is one of Tony Blair's aides. The Downing Street memo, unfortunately for Kerry, doesn't have any quotes from either Blair or Bush. Worldnetdaily.com had a nice article on this new attempt by the left to regain power, with a quite stunning quote by Kerry. I say that only because he used the word stunning twice in the same sentence. "When I go back on Monday, I am going to raise the issue, I think it's a stunning, unbelievably simple and understandable statement of the truth and a profoundly important document that raises stunning issues here at home."
When I read that stunning statement, which was so profoundly important and unbelievably simple (like him) I was stunned. He is starting to remind me of Gore, Moore, Dean and Nader. What a colossal bunch of sore losers. Let's not forget that Kerry made a better case for invading Iraq than Bush did. That was of course before we actually did it. If Clinton had done it he would have been cheering and dancing around with his pompoms, just like the liberals did every time Clinton invaded somewhere. But that is why they keep losing elections. They are psychological contortionists who belong in a freak show. I hope they never figure it out. It would be nice to see the Communist wing of our government noisily go away in the night as they scream 'Theocracy' and 'Fascists'.
Like most intelligent people I find it easy to ignore Moore and Gore. The most interesting is actually Nader, who has been a great Perotesque payback for the liberals and their media friends. In this last election he didn't play much of a role however. The other most interesting leftwinger is Dean. He has issued some of the most stunning statements I have ever heard lately. He has done so at a time when the Democrats are making statements about being more inclusive. One might be inclined to ask why these noisy three stooges - Dean, Kerry and Nader - are becoming so talked about again and so vocal. The answer is quite simple. It reminds me of an old joke. "Why do the Rolling Stones keep Keith Richards in the band? To make Mick Jagger look healthy." As these three Stooges move to the left and make Moore and Moore noise Hillary starts to look Moore and Moore rational and centrist.
What has been the most interesting to me, however, has been watching Hillary. She has been the spearhead of the Culture war and the Democratic Party revolves around her. She knows it too. One of my favorite quotes from her was: "Any President that lies to the people should be removed from office." Don't get excited though. She was talking about the guy that created the Environmental Protection Agency, started the nuclear weapon reduction talks, opened the door to China and started the end of the Vietnam War. Those were all things the liberals talked about doing, but like always they had no real plans. They just talked about it. Hillary wasn't talking about her own philandering husband. She was talking about Richard Nixon.
You will continue to see Hillary standing tall amidst the mental midgets that surround her. You will continue to read about how evil the Patriot Act is, with continuing references not to the one that passed and was signed into law, but rather the draft (which Tom Daschle originally submitted) as if it were the law. You will continue to read about the illegal war in Iraq and how there were no WMDs there, knowing that it is widely believed that they were moved to Syria. Recently even the UN mentioned that much of the WMD equipment seems to be missing. Major media didn't touch that, however. Those who attempt to call Bush a Socialist are also unwitting members of this fine parade of clowns. I leave you with two quotes.
Nicolai Lenin said: "We must build communism with non-Communist hands."
George Dimitrov, a Soviet Dialectician, defines a Communist front: "Advice to the Lenin School of Political Warfare," as quoted in the report of the American Bar Association Committee on Communist Tactics, Strategy and Objectives--CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, August 22, 1958, page 17719. "As Soviet power grows, there will be greater aversion to Communist Parties everywhere. So we must practice the techniques of withdrawal. Never appear in the foreground; Let our friends do the work. We must always remember that one sympathizer is generally worth more than a dozen militant Communists. A university professor, who, without being a party member, lends himself to the interests of the Soviet Union, is worth more than a hundred men with party cards. A writer of reputation or a retired general are worth more than 500 poor devils who don't know any better than to get themselves beaten up by the police. Every man has his value, his merit.
was Nicolai Lenin related to Vladimir Ilyich Lenin?
I'm stuned as well.
And here's a great quote from Marx:
"Well, those are my principles. And if you don't like them...well, I have others." -Groucho Marx
Every man has his value, his merit.
Some make better target than other, because the mouth is always open and the ears closed. They don't hear you coming after them till is't too late.
Lenin also called them "Useful Idiots."
..Every man has his value, his merit. ......
He can always serve as a horrible examle....
"... a bill signed by then President Clinton named "The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998" gave President Bush all of the legal recourse necessary for the war".
That statement has already been put out there by a member of the MSM. That seems to indicate that the MSM already is trying to point out that this memo proves NOTHING.
Kerry will look like the total fool that he is for listening to the rapid DUers.
Yeah. Maybe he can work on a retro impeachment for FDR on selling East Europe to Stalin, hiding his war aims and concealing his health problems during the 4 term election.
Don't forget Truman in calling Korea a UN "police" action.
Oh, yeah, and Kennedy bargained European security by moving missles to settle the cuban crisis.
Oh, did history vindicate these Presidents? Oh well then, never mind.
The left out one is Soros.
Kerry, Soros, and Dean = menage et tois (will the dims learn to distance - nah)...
if anyone should be impeached it should be kerry... the traitor
read later
"... a bill signed by then President Clinton named "The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998" gave President Bush all of the legal recourse necessary for the war".
I disagree that this act in any way autorized war. It is a much stronger arguement that the 1991 cease-fire stipulated that Hussein had to agree to certain conditions, which he did not. Unfortunately, at the time, our President was more interested in fitting an intern under the Presidental Desk, then kicking Hussein's butt.
From the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998 (last paragraph): "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act . "
"(except as provided in section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act"
And .. what did the "except" say ..?? Seems you forgot that part.
And .. here is the link for the article where I got that information:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1416968/posts
The author also said: "However, All Headline News has re-discovered that a bill signed by then President Clinton named "The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998" gave President Bush all of the legal recourse necessary for the war."
RUMORS AS TO HILLARY'S SEXUALITY DEVASTATING... RESEARCHING...
what's THIS all about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.