[judgemc]

From reading the letters to the editor in my local paper in his district I would say he has won as many supporters who were straddling the party fence as he has lost. The letters are about 50/50. He's losing strict conservatives but gaining moderate Democrats.

[A Balrog of Morgoth]

The letters are about 50/50.

I'd venture to say that letters to the editor generally run about 50/50 on just about any subject, if the paper is relatively objective.

[SoCar]

Sure he is. Just who do you think decides what letters get published? And who do you think votes in Republican primaries? It's not those mythical "moderate Dems" I can assure you. The MSM is doing whatever they can to spin in Lindsey's favor on this. I do not buy it for one second. The activists that vote are very, very, angry!

I also have to add that the media is making it out that it's only the social conservatives and Christian right that care about this deal on judges. Wrong. I am neither a social conservative or Christian and judges are the most important issue to me. I want them to follow the law not to make it. This issue cuts a wide swath amongst all Republicans.

[Carling]

From reading the letters to the editor in my local paper in his district I would say he has won as many supporters who were straddling the party fence as he has lost. The letters are about 50/50. He's losing strict conservatives but gaining moderate Democrats.

Judging public reaction from Letters to the Editor is laughable. The editor is choosing which letter to print. You do realize this, right?

[Lancey Howard]

From reading the letters to the editor in my local paper in his district I would say he has won as many supporters who were straddling the party fence as he has lost. The letters are about 50/50. He's losing strict conservatives but gaining moderate Democrats.

Which is a huge net loss. Those conservatives would have definitely stuck with somebody who did the right thing. The scumbag "moderate" Democrats will vote Democrat no matter what. Of course.

[SouthCarolinaKit]

Ah, yes. One can certainly see the polling of 'real' people by reading the MSM. Does anyone actually trust the letters selected for publication to be typical? My guess is they get 3 for and 3000 against, then publish all the for and 3 of the against. I'm from SC and will NEVER vote for Graham again.
That goes for everyone I know here. His main characteristic is his wierdness and I don't trust him with my representation.
I can NOT wait to vote against him!