To: hedgetrimmer; 1rudeboy; Dog Gone; LowCountryJoe; Mase
the N.A.F.T.A. is ultimately aimed at allowing the free movement of labour and its products across national boundariesWow, some Canadian lawyers said this!!! That's almost as good as it being in the actual treaty.
Try again? And this time why don't you quote some AFL-CIO leaders, E.P.I., Harry Reid or, heaven forbid, the treaty itself.
Wait, here is a quote for you "Yesterday, Toddsterpatriot said that anyone who thinks a trade treaty grants citizenship rights to illegals is a freakin' idiot!!!" I like that quote best. Feel free to use it.
18 posted on
06/02/2005 9:05:53 PM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with Karl Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
To: Toddsterpatriot; hedgetrimmer; Justanobody; texastoo
Hey todd, did you leave of the /s tag? There are several of us following this, and digging deeper into the relationship with NAFTA as well... I'll speak for myself, but others would probably agree, we are looking at a set of trade criteria which is completely out of sinc with what Americans believe America should be doing for her own citizens.. And it's being done behind our backs, but yet in plain sight if you go to our government websites to read it for yourself. Therein lies a problem, for me anyway.. there is absolutely no media focus on this 'evolution' of the Americas, nor the cost to Americans, and their sovereign voice. So, with that, I'll accept your arrows and insight.
19 posted on
06/02/2005 9:18:35 PM PDT by
JesseJane
(Flush the RINO RATPACK 7 - ~Selling America to Soros~, Right McCain? Right Lindsay?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
You don't need citizenship if you live in a "trade agreement area" and you are protected by the "right of establishment".
Citizenship to the "free traders" can be used to mine human beings for funds, but it doesn't grant any rights that "national treatment" doesn't guarantee.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson