Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Auntie Dem
Auntie Dem said: "The statute of limitations had expired on that year (meaning the IRS could not legally assess any additional tax), but Nixon voluntarily waived the statute and paid the additional tax due. "

I would be surprised to hear that the Judiciary Committee had recommended to the House an article of impeachment regarding a tax return that could not be proved.

Also, are you sure about the statute of limitations? There may be a time limit to challenging the accuracy of a tax return for purposes of amending the tax due. This is not necessarily the same as a statute of limitation concerning commission of a felony by use of a forged document. Perhaps you can clarify what you are suggesting and also suggest a reason that Nixon paid the tax.

33 posted on 06/02/2005 9:52:13 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
Also, are you sure about the statute of limitations?

I was working for the IRS at the time it happened. There is a 3 year civil statute barring additional assessments unless 25% or more of your income was omitted from the return, then it is a 6 year statute. There is no statute of limitations if there is fraud. Since the issue involved a deduction from income, not the omission of income the 6 year statute did not apply. The fraud aspect of the back dated document was never pursued by the IRS, otherwise he wouldn't have needed to voluntarily waive his rights to civilly pay the tax.

My guess is the IRS couldn't prove Nixon knew the appraisal was back dated.

34 posted on 06/03/2005 7:53:36 AM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson