Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport

For one thing, Bush has mentioned Scalia as being the kind of judge he would appoint in the case of a vacancy. In addition, Scalia has indicated an interest, and there are rumors that he'd retire if someone else were nominated to succeed Rehnquest.

Another factor is that, in spite of their vastly different views, Scalia is personally frieldly with Ruth Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. Maybe Bush figures he could influence them on a few key votes, though it hasn't happened so far.


23 posted on 05/28/2005 8:41:05 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

Thanks...... I see those things but see them as the exact reasons as why President Bush won't select Scalia. The obvious is often not the course with President Bush or that is my observations. Again thanks for sharing your reasoning.


25 posted on 05/28/2005 8:48:17 PM PDT by deport (Women always get the last say in an argument.. anything after that is the start of a new argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson