Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon
Probability arguments "against" evolution (and the ones I've actually seen have been bogus) is in no way -- repeat, *no* *way* -- repeat, *NO* *WAY* -- evidence *for* "ID" or "creationism" or whatever you want to call it.

Then what are they? Further results of natural selection and random mutation?

985 posted on 05/26/2005 4:35:59 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 982 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
[Probability arguments "against" evolution (and the ones I've actually seen have been bogus) is in no way -- repeat, *no* *way* -- repeat, *NO* *WAY* -- evidence *for* "ID" or "creationism" or whatever you want to call it.]

Then what are they? Further results of natural selection and random mutation?

No, they are the results of creationists making simplistic and faulty calculations based on their poor knowledge (and in many cases, completely misunderstanding) of evolutionary biology.

987 posted on 05/26/2005 4:38:49 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 985 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson