You do not realize how willing I am to admit to ignorance, or how capable I am of demonstrating it. There's no reason I cannot engage in ignorance while pointing it out at the same time. It is ignorant to accept or present wild assertions as scientific fact when evidence has not been presented to back the claims. Evolutionists assert that information can arise and be communicated without an intelligent agent, but they have not demonstrated how this might happen other than by suggesting a process or two that, ipso facto, must be the cause. They defend this position with courts and judges. That's not only ignorant, but abusively so.
You are really really good at this. Something I can agree with you completely.