Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zavien Doombringer
"no, they were to be together. To procreate, the first reason and recreation while doing it.
It wasn't meant for casual recreation."

Then I am confused by why it is pleasurable even when a woman is not fertile, even after menopause? Let's keep it inside a monogamous marriage, even- after menopause married couples should not have sex?
Not trying to be contrary here, I simply don't get the logic...
642 posted on 05/25/2005 1:09:10 PM PDT by Dawsonville_Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]


To: Dawsonville_Doc

Stop trying to argue logic with some on this board, the concept confuses them greatly.


643 posted on 05/25/2005 1:14:01 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

To: Dawsonville_Doc; Zavien Doombringer

logic?
you address a question of logic to one who has maintained that he has not offered all-or-nothing arguments, yet turns around and asks whether a statement containing two refutable absolutes should be considred true?
Doc, Doc, Doc... *shaking head sadly*


646 posted on 05/25/2005 1:23:03 PM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson