Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: texasbluebell
Wendy said NARAL recently put out a statement saying that any nominee who does NOT state how s/he would vote on the "right to choose" will be considered a nominee who triggers this extraordinary circumstance situation.

What I don't understand is why can't any one of the Democrats that were NOT a party to this agreement simply say "I didn't sign that agreement, and I won't abide by it".

191 posted on 05/24/2005 6:48:29 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: Fury
What I don't understand is why can't any one of the Democrats that were NOT a party to this agreement simply say "I didn't sign that agreement, and I won't abide by it".

Because the D's always stick together, and the R's don't.

199 posted on 05/24/2005 6:51:58 AM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: Fury
And the republicans???????

I can't understand how it would take a majority to go nucular but 14 can decide on this stupid "compromise".
Seems to me either side can say I didn't vote for that piece of crap!!
228 posted on 05/24/2005 7:11:40 AM PDT by jackv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson