Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis of a Sellout
ABP ^ | 5/24/05 | ABP

Posted on 05/24/2005 5:27:34 AM PDT by crushkerry

It's now time for the non-emotional analysis of last night's filibuster deal. Yes, the gut reaction disgust at the deal still applies.. But let's for a moment (and only for a moment) move beyond that initial anger at the betrayal and give a more reasoned analysis of why the RINO's sold us out and why this is a bad deal.

First, and most obviously, there is no guarantee of up or down votes for all nominees, something that was a non-negotiable to us.

But just as troubling is the language in the Memorandum of Understanding that the RINO's have agreed not to use the "Constitutional Option" for this Congress. It has been said that this agreement by the RINO's not to trigger the Constitutional Option is contingent on the Democrats living up to their end of the deal vis a vis only filibustering in "Extraordinary circumstances".

This means that the RINO's simply have to believe the Dems are using their best discretion and judgment in determining that "extraordinary circumstances" exist. Not only is this mind-reading impossible, but it gives the RINO's an easy "out" not to trigger the Constitutional Option. It would appear that even if the RINO's disagree with the reasons Dems give for thinking "extraordinary circumstances" exist, they may be bound to honor the deal if they think the Dems are acting in good conscience.

Plus, with all this happy pabulum about the deal being based on trust, and how the Senate is a place where people have to take colleagues at their "word", don't you think it's going to be hard for one of these RINO's to say one of the Dems isn't acting in good faith or following the deal's commitments? That would be akin to calling them a liar, and that just doesn't happen among this chummy bunch. Also, these RINO's have shown the last thing in the world the want is conflict or a vote, and I think that mindset is going to make it near impossible for them to cry "foul" on the Democrats belief that "extraordinary circumstances" exist. And we all know what that means don't we?

You can tell these people are lawyers because they put in weasel words like "extraordinary circumstances" that no one can define, and as Sissy Graham's pompous Hardball comments suggest, they didn't talk about specific instances and people. Only in a place like the Senate where the real world doesn't apply could they have purposely avoided specifics in order to get a deal. You just know there are going to be problems with this deal later, and I'm more certain the Dems won't budge on their belief in "extraordinary circumstances" exist than I am that the RINO's will actually vote to go with the "Constitutional Option".

There are those that say "Well how could the Dems use the "extraordinary circumstances" rationale now that they let Owens and Brown through, who they had so excoriated?" Easy. When has logic ever applied in this case. Also, as many on the left have said "Tonight offers a new beginning", which to me means that the Dems will say Owens and Brown did not set the baseline, but rather were allowed to pass in order to get a deal, not as a barometer for future nominees.

Finally, this deal makes the "smoky back room" even smaller than usually occurs. This is a power grab by the 7 RINO's, who do not represent the party as a whole, or the majority of Republicans. Yet they are now emboldened to wield clout they are not entitled to based on their empty ideology of compromise. Witness Graham's smug statement tonight that these 14 will likely form a Social Security reform plan - (read a higher income limit on the payroll tax and no private accounts) and that these 14 are going to meet when the President puts up a Supreme Court nominee to decide if "extraordinary circumstances" exist and whether the Dems are filibustering in good faith as proof of this.

These RINO's will undoubtedly be hailed by their real constituency, the MSM, as brave. But we know them for what they are - spineless cowards. Think about it - who is happier with this deal - Bill Frist or Harry Reid. There was only one way to judge the winners and losers here and that's by asking this question: Will every judicial nominee get an up or down vote? Since the answer is "No", we lose.

Even Judas got 30 pieces of silver. The RINO's didn't even get that.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2005 5:27:35 AM PDT by crushkerry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; LincolnLover; jmstein7; backinthefold; .cnI redruM; OXENinFLA; Badeye; K1avg; ...

Ping


2 posted on 05/24/2005 5:28:04 AM PDT by crushkerry (Visit www.anklebitingpundits.com for great original conservative commentary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

ping


3 posted on 05/24/2005 5:29:54 AM PDT by PilloryHillary (pilloryhillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I must be missing something. I thought that the filibuster had always been about extraordinary circumstances. What's been gained here? (other than CYA for RINOs)


4 posted on 05/24/2005 5:32:04 AM PDT by beckaz (The facts of life are conservative. (Maggie Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
McCain now runs as 'The real uniter.' He just fired a shot across the bow of everyone to his right in the 2008 primaries. He's now 'the reasonable' GOP candidate.

I hope the party apparatus in both Iowa and New Hampshire hangs this man by his family jewels.
5 posted on 05/24/2005 5:32:53 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("Every man's your brother 'til the rent comes due" - Anon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary
Will every judicial nominee get an up or down vote? Since the answer is "No", we lose.

I don't feel any better about this deal today than I did last night.

6 posted on 05/24/2005 5:34:30 AM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
First, and most obviously, there is no guarantee of up or down votes for all nominees, something that was a non-negotiable to us.

Up/down votes on all nominees would be great, but I'll take up/down on 7 key judges if it means that we won't have to take the barrage of criticism from the MSM because we somehow altered the genetic makeup of the Senate. Unfortunately, the vast majority of sheeple would have heard the MSM and believed what they would have said about us, much like whoat occurred in '98 when we got slaughtered in the mid-term elections.
7 posted on 05/24/2005 5:34:31 AM PDT by hispanichoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Care to guess who will be running in 2008? I still think he was "turned" at the Hanoi Hilton!!!


8 posted on 05/24/2005 5:36:36 AM PDT by stitches1951
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
it gives the RINO's an easy "out" not to trigger the Constitutional Option

Yep, it's just another path to the next betrayal of conservatives.

9 posted on 05/24/2005 5:38:02 AM PDT by Brett66 (W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1 W1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: handy

This isn't the leadership I wanted from the GOP.

At the national level, there are no Republicans or Democrats. It's only Socialist Party A and Socialist Party B. There's no more difference between being a Republican or a Democrat than there is being a fan of the Red Sox or the Yankees.


10 posted on 05/24/2005 5:38:13 AM PDT by henkster (When democrats talk of "the rich," they are referring to anyone with a private sector job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: handy
We have gained some things and lost nothing.....what's the beef? the basics
11 posted on 05/24/2005 5:39:15 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Never in history has a group of RINOS so cravenly snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. They have created an unmitigated disaster for the party when there could have been an unparalleled victory.


12 posted on 05/24/2005 5:39:29 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Yes, we're still getting wheels spinning in mud.


13 posted on 05/24/2005 5:39:38 AM PDT by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
I like the comparison to Neville Chamberlain. Its appropriate.

More to the point its time to teach some of these traitors a lesson. No money, no support.

Let them go to their precious moderates when re-election time comes.

14 posted on 05/24/2005 5:41:09 AM PDT by An Old Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: handy

"I don't feel any better about this deal today than I did last night."

After having more time to think about this mess...I'm more angry than I was last night!


15 posted on 05/24/2005 5:42:39 AM PDT by PilloryHillary (pilloryhillary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
He's now 'the reasonable' GOP candidate.

McCain is toast and so are the rest of these sanctimonious "intellectuals". They have awakened a grizzly close by, and all they have for protection are cross-over democrats and a translucent media.

16 posted on 05/24/2005 5:43:40 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

History records once again that there are no great "moderate" leaders. Never has been, never will be. They are gutless wonders that stand for nothing.


17 posted on 05/24/2005 5:45:35 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Excrementum Occurum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
Ok...

Votes on the first three should go today... We get to see who is for and who is against jurist the Dems have label led as "extremist". Say they get confirmed... What then?

Frist brings the next group to the floor and the Dems filibuster? Will there be another 100 hours of debate on them? Will there be a cloture vote. Or it goes straight to a vote and the Republican "compromisers" vote against their party based on the deal? There is a lot of ground still to be covered and it sounds like all the crowing was premature. Frist needs to be more forceful in saying that this compromise was a "deal" that is not supported by the leadership so its enactment is not the responsibility of those Republicans who were not party to the deal... This is going to continue to be entertaining.
18 posted on 05/24/2005 5:46:41 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An Old Marine

McCain has blown his chances for the presidency once again. Here's a guy that SHOULD be a natural candidate for the GOP. Even his opponents respect his valiant service to his country, and his stands on many issues is acceptable. Yet there's a reason actual Republicans voted overwelmingly against him in 2000. Like Darth Vader, he's been seduced by the "dark side"--the MSM--and Republican voters know it.


19 posted on 05/24/2005 5:46:58 AM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil
McCain is toast and so are the rest of these sanctimonious "intellectuals". They have awakened a grizzly close by, and all they have for protection are cross-over democrats and a translucent media.

I certainly hope you are right. People need to get mad @ McCain & his buddies.

20 posted on 05/24/2005 5:48:53 AM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson