Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress

Not for this Congress. How can this possibly be a good deal?

904 posted on 05/23/2005 5:26:48 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
How can this possibly be a good deal?

I'm a "silver lining" type of guy, so I can't see how the Dems could filibuster the nomination of Judge Owens or Judge Brown to the Supreme Court when they passed the Senate with a plurality. Not even Raplh Neas could pull that one off.

937 posted on 05/23/2005 5:31:23 PM PDT by TonyInOhio ("See how wonderful life can be when you're maniacal?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
It postpones the nuclear option in exchange for getting our judges confirmed.

I think I would have preferred the nuclear option to be employed, but if the end result is that all judges get an up or down vote, plus they work on other legislative items like making the tax cuts permanent and social security reform, I think that's a win.

Let the Democrats claim victory. Realists will recongnize otherwise.

981 posted on 05/23/2005 5:37:13 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson