Posted on 05/17/2005 5:19:14 PM PDT by Libloather
RODHAM WATCH
Did Bill Clinton know of gala's financial fraud?
'Dear, dear friend of the president' admits to knowledge of Hillary fund-raiser scam
--------------------------------------
Posted: May 17, 2005
5:00 p.m. Eastern
By Ron Strom
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
An associate and friend of Bill Clinton has testified in court he knew about the campaign-finance fraud involving a Hillary Clinton fund-raiser, raising further questions about what the president and then-first lady knew about the scam.
David Rosen, a fund-raiser for Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign, is on trial in Los Angeles for allegedly lying about the true cost of a 2000 Hollywood gala event attended by the candidate and then-President Clinton.
While Rosen's attorney claims his client was in the dark about the cost – which the FBI says exceeded $1.2 million – prosecution witness Jim Levin, a friend and fund-raising aide of Bill Clinton who helped organize the event, says Rosen knew the true cost and agreed not to tell federal regulators, as is required. According to the indictment, Rosen reported contributions of about $400,000.
Tom Fitton, president of government watchdog legal group Judicial Watch, was present for Levin's testimony on Thursday and called it "devastating for the Clintons."
Levin last week signed an agreement to cooperate with federal prosecutors and plead guilty to bribery and fraud charges in an unrelated case in Chicago.
Fitton told WND: "Levin described himself as a dear, dear friend of the president, whom he met at a birthday party for Hillary in 1997."
Levin said he later met with the president at his request to discuss fund raising and that "it turned into a personal and business relationship."
The witness says he then began doing fund raising for the Democratic Party, organizing 30 or 40 events. Levin described Rosen as his "mentor" in politics.
In his testimony, Levin discussed a Chicago meeting that included himself, longtime Hillary aide Kelly Craighead and Rosen.
According to Fitton, Levin testified Rosen said at the meeting: "We didn't hear that; you didn't tell me that" while discussing the true cost of a Chicago fund-raiser involving Olivia Newton John.
Noted Fitton: "They're all talking campaign-finance fraud!"
It was at the Chicago meeting the group discussed the idea of staging the Hollywood gala.
Levin said he later reported directly to Bill Clinton about plans for the star-studded fund-raiser, saying Clinton was excited.
"The president was very impressed," Levin testified.
Said Fitton: "This is the president's personal emissary with knowledge of this fraud."
While Levin testified under cross examination that he had no conversations with the president about the cost of the gala "before the event," he was not asked about any talk of it after the fund-raiser took place.
"The follow-up question was never asked," Fitton said.
"Levin largely confirmed everything [former Judicial Watch client] Peter Paul had been saying about the escalating cost, Peter's constant complaints about it and Rosen's refusal to deal with it."
Paul, a former Hollywood Internet entrepreneur and partner of "Spiderman" creator Stan Lee, says he spent nearly $2 million to produce the Hollywood gala and was repeatedly assured that his expenses would be reported to the Federal Election Commission, according to Judicial Watch.
Attorneys at Judicial Watch brought a lawsuit in 2001 on behalf of Paul against Bill and Hillary Clinton, Rosen and other Clinton representatives after Bill Clinton reneged on a $17 million deal to work for Paul's Internet companies after he left the White House and because Paul's expenses were not reported to the FEC.
Fitton noted that in the trial little attention is being paid to the question of "what Bill Clinton knew and when he knew it."
"There are a lot of unasked questions," he said of the trial.
"Despite the government's efforts and the judge's efforts to keep the Clintons out of the trial, it is about the Clintons," Fitton told WND.
"We're expected to think that this dear friend of the president [Levin] never had any discussions about this?"
Fitton wonders why neither Craighead nor Levin have been indicted for conspiracy.
"Rosen is being hung out to dry," he said.
Rosen's trial resumed today and is expected to take two weeks to complete.
Bump...
When the house of cards falls who and how many will be under it??
Yes he does. But - as with all the other corruption - he (and she) will get away with another crime. I'd love to be wrong about this but I'm afraid I'm not.
Of course!
Michael Isikoff will be one !
The Clinton's truly are the Masters of "Diversion"
Their slimy paws are all over both of these scandals.
and who will end up at the bottom when this goes boom? Not Bubba, he has executive clemency I believe...
it will always be the people that do the running for the Clintons that get whacked, arrested or jailed. Its never the ones at the top.
Tony Soprano would be proud...
In whacked do you mean "dead"??
yeah as in Vince Foster or Secretary Brown whacked....
The Klinks corrupted everything they got their hands on. Wouldn't have it any other way. Case closed.
Hmmmmmmm .. interesting
Should we hold our breath for a Cintons/Kennedy accident??
This is bubbling along quite well, isn't it?
Let us return to the Michael Isikoff/Monicagate/Rosen connection... anybody but me see the underlying thread here??
hint... hint... her name begins with "H"
Nah, it can't be that Isikoff sacrificied himself for payback...
hmmm
Only a damned fool would believe Bill and Hillary knew nothing about this fraud. Just the scandal of it would ruin a republican. Wont touch these two though.
Nice thought, but I truly think Isikoff thought he'd hit the jackpot.
Remember.. it was a very "small" plant.. not even in the Conventional Wisdom section.. Someone had to be alerted to pick up that very "small" paragraph.. this could not be more intentional if "it" got up and SCREAMED!
Senators and ex-presidents may have some power, but it's nothing like the power a sitting president has. And then, there's the tape from Reggie. :-)
Reggie...as in Teddy's BIL? What's in the tape?
Clintons have lied to us many times. They both can look us right in the camera and lie anytime any place. So, why is anyone surprised about the new Hillarygate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.