Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-aide's trial puts Hil at high risk - GOP SALIVATES over campaign finance case
NY Daily News ^ | 5/11/05 | KENNETH R. BAZINET

Posted on 05/11/2005 4:07:47 PM PDT by Libloather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Still, if Rosen is convicted, Clinton (D-N.Y.) is certain to face repeated attack ads accusing her of...

Crimes? No kidding. Say, does anyone recall Big Media being worried about Dubya getting attacked - politically? Didn't think so...

1 posted on 05/11/2005 4:07:50 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So her corruption is all about republicans?


2 posted on 05/11/2005 4:14:18 PM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Gosh, I don't believe any of this. My hero, Matt Lauer, says that control freak, micromanaging paranoid sociopath Hillary is a "victim" of this criminal investigation into the largest campaign fraud in Congressional history.


3 posted on 05/11/2005 4:15:36 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Funny how they have a draw from a different list of verbs/adjectives for Conservatives vs Libs when telling their story.

Never heard that the Dems were salivating over Delay either.

4 posted on 05/11/2005 4:16:48 PM PDT by cricket (Just say - NO U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
It won't work!

The old biddies that voted her into the Senate will also vote for Hillary as president, no matter what comes out of this trial.

Hillary is the poor little victim, doncha know?

5 posted on 05/11/2005 4:19:12 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If you replaced Hillary's name with that of Tom DeLay, does anyone believe that this piece would have been written?


6 posted on 05/11/2005 4:21:28 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Pretty good article.


7 posted on 05/11/2005 4:23:01 PM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember; MurryMom; doug from upland; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog; Mudboy Slim
My hero, Matt Lauer, says that control freak, micromanaging paranoid sociopath Hillary is a "victim" of this criminal investigation into the largest campaign fraud in Congressional history.

If the *Beast woke up one morning (sun and all) and noticed *she was running out of loot, would *she be the kind of person that would allow illegalities to occur in order for an election win?

Oh, my. (Murrymom, you and your so-called party doan look so good...)

8 posted on 05/11/2005 4:23:49 PM PDT by Libloather (Start Hillary's recount now - just to get it out of the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
PETER PAUL AND HILLARY - THE MOVIE! --- We need your help.
9 posted on 05/11/2005 4:29:37 PM PDT by doug from upland (MOCKING DEMOCRATS 24/7 --- www.rightwingparodies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

yeah ,... anyone who has even casually followed her career , knows that plausible deniability is a transparent falsehood , but she'll still use it!!


10 posted on 05/11/2005 4:31:50 PM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
But, but, but the mainstream media tells me that the goddess Hillary is a saint (atual illustration from the NY Times!):


11 posted on 05/11/2005 4:33:55 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

LOL. Sure seems to be. At least the presstitutes are reporting something, which reminds all of the Clinton corruption stink. This is a good thing...


12 posted on 05/11/2005 4:34:17 PM PDT by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Not to worry. She's already taken the shredder to the docs and replaced them with new ones.


13 posted on 05/11/2005 4:34:28 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (Steelers in '06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
You could do us all a favor and NOT blow this up - OK?

(If you have ANY mercy in your soul...)

14 posted on 05/11/2005 4:51:51 PM PDT by Libloather (Start Hillary's recount now - just to get it out of the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

lol


15 posted on 05/11/2005 4:53:30 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
"But, but, but the mainstream media tells me that the goddess Hillary is a saint (atual illustration from the NY Times!):"

St Hillary of NY meet Joan of Arc

16 posted on 05/11/2005 4:53:47 PM PDT by spokeshave (Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cricket

> Never heard that the Dems were salivating over Delay either.

I think the Delay business is only whining and obstruction, just like it was with Cheney and Rumsfeld.

There is no comparison with the trouble Rodham's finance director is in. We are talking 15 years here. "If it was any other senator, it might not be an issue..." Yeah, right.

But the guy (author of the article) is right. I am salivating, and what Freeper is not? :)


17 posted on 05/11/2005 5:05:01 PM PDT by cloud8 (pull the plug on NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

It's Bush's and DeLay's fault!


18 posted on 05/11/2005 5:05:11 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Remember, this is only a temporary exile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cricket

...Never heard that the Dems were salivating over Delay either...

If Tom Delay had benefited to the tune 800K and his campaign finance manger were going on trial for it, do you think the MSM would say that he had nothing to do with it?

Silly question, right?


19 posted on 05/11/2005 5:29:50 PM PDT by planekT (Go DeLay, Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
"I think the Delay business is only whining and obstruction, just like it was with Cheney and Rumsfeld. "

So, okay. . .no salivating; but we can at least give the Dems credit for doggedly and determedly making a mouthfull of Delay while trying to 'chew him up'; and 'spit him out' in an unrecognizeable form. ;^)

20 posted on 05/11/2005 5:49:46 PM PDT by cricket (Just say - NO U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson