Skip to comments.
Survey USA: Approval Ratings for All 50 Governors as of 05/10/05
NBC News ^
| May 10, 2005
Posted on 05/10/2005 7:45:50 PM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
05/10/2005 7:45:52 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
How can this be? Richardson has a 54% approval rating -- I disapprove of him 100% of the time. Is this polling group located in King County, WA?
2
posted on
05/10/2005 7:52:30 PM PDT
by
DesertDreamer
("We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom."~~President George W. Bush, 9/2/2004)
To: Dubya's fan; RWR8189
This'll be of interest to you FRiend ping.
RWR8189, Damn fine posting out of you, sir!
Owl_Eagle
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
3
posted on
05/10/2005 7:53:16 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: RWR8189
Interesting post. Thanks.
4
posted on
05/10/2005 7:55:17 PM PDT
by
texasflower
("America's vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one." President George W. Bush 01/20/05)
To: RWR8189
Notice that Republicans tend to have stinky approval ratings, while the RATS have good ratings. I suspect that the RAT base has been overstated in these polls.
5
posted on
05/10/2005 7:55:37 PM PDT
by
Kuksool
To: RWR8189
When we get a legit Governor in Washington his poll numbers will be much better.
To: RWR8189
>>47
Washington
Christine Gregoire 34% 58%
Um, is she governor? Oh wait...
7
posted on
05/10/2005 7:55:44 PM PDT
by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: RWR8189
Looks like the boys in the Dakotas are doing a heck of a job while Mr. Taft of Ohio is in serious jeopardy.
8
posted on
05/10/2005 7:57:30 PM PDT
by
Mustng959
(Honoring those that gave their all in support of our freedoms)
To: Kuksool
I was very pleased to see my Rat governor, Blago, with a 36% approval rating, he's up for reelection next year too.
9
posted on
05/10/2005 7:57:39 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: RWR8189
Taft's got a 74% rating?
Granholm's up to 57%? That's the highest I've seen, although I have seen an over 55% rating of "Would consider someone else at the next election."
To: Mustng959
Taft is retiring IIRC.
The Republican Sec of State Ken Blackwell will run for his seat and will probably win.
11
posted on
05/10/2005 7:58:19 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: RWR8189
Blago's approval ratings have been souring among IL voters. But I feel that he will survive re-election. The Il GOP can't rally around a good candidate to oust him.
12
posted on
05/10/2005 7:58:38 PM PDT
by
Kuksool
To: DesertDreamer
And Arizona's Napolitano has an even higher rating at 59% -- must of surveyed all the illegal ailens to get that high a number.
To: RWR8189
Minnesota Tim Pawlenty 54% 38%
Not bad in a tough state.
To: RWR8189
Maine-John Baldacci=37%
Surprised it's that high. What a jerk.
15
posted on
05/10/2005 7:59:35 PM PDT
by
armymarinemom
(My sons freed Iraqi and Afghanistan Honor Roll students.And we're unlikely to get a look into this t)
To: RWR8189
How in the world can Ed Rendull (Big City Union Thug) have an approval rating of 48%?
90% of that must come from his Philly mafia goons...
16
posted on
05/10/2005 8:00:48 PM PDT
by
THX 1138
To: Kuksool
Survey USA's ratings are to be taken with a grain of salt.
In the 2004 election, one of the phones at GOP headquarters in Lansing was called. I was right there when it happened. We had fun with that one.
To: Kuksool
Survey USA typically has pretty accurate STATE poll numbers - (if I am recalling correctly). They are one of the polling places to watch for STATE polls during Presidential election years -
To: Kuksool
Notice that Republicans tend to have stinky approval ratings, while the RATS have good ratings. I suspect that the RAT base has been overstated in these polls. Possibly, but the MSM local press probably has a lot to do with it by editorializing against everything a Pub wants to accomplish and praising to high heavens the Rat agendas.
To: RWR8189
Lots of interesting numbers here .... looks good for Hoeven running for Senate in 2006 .... hopefully Rounds vs. Johnson in 2008.
Some ratings didn't seem easily explained: Matt Blunt??!? And I knew Granholm's #s were down but that's pretty bad.
20
posted on
05/10/2005 8:03:27 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(“When you’re hungry, you eat; when you’re a frog, you leap; if you’re scared, get a dog.”)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson