Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mhking
I may be naive, but I cannot believe any jury could be cajoled into believing that post was political in content. Thats why the banning is beyond question. But I don't think he did anything illegal, because he was an authorized user at the time he posted them (even though he was abusing those privileges), and because the content was inherently political.

The only thing I think we could hang our hat on was that "all n-----rs and jews" was directed specifically to appropriate minorities. (Which is odd - that indicates a fair amount of knowledge of the players here.)

282 posted on 05/09/2005 6:48:37 AM PDT by jude24 ("Stupid" isn't illegal - but it should be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: jude24
(Which is odd - that indicates a fair amount of knowledge of the players here.)

When that is combined with the "infiltration" from posters on StormFront (there are some there who have specifically stated their intent to disrupt at FR), lends credence to a goal of going after specific people.

305 posted on 05/09/2005 6:52:21 AM PDT by mhking ("Today, we're gonna do things the RIGHT way...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: jude24

Did you read my earlier post about this not being an adult website and that children do frequent here? Offering or supplying pornography to minors, if not mistaken is a federal crime at least I know it is a state crime. Now, if this guy is out of country that would be differant.


308 posted on 05/09/2005 6:52:35 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson