One thing the article doesn't state is what form of contraception is being sought, which makes me think perhaps it is the "Plan B" morning after pill or RU 486, not the pill most folks think of as apprpriate for contraception and other regulating effects. I am not for any of them, but given the recent up tick in stories about pharmacists refusing to fill contraception prescriptions, I think they must be sweetening the pot with some of these early abortion pills.
In Illinois, PP is giving EC out like candy at parties.
See StraightupwithSherri on blogsforterri.com or prolifeblogs.com
Wake up. Stop pointificating about the mean old pharmacists until you've learned what the real deal is here.
PP is very clever. They have alredy redefined pregnancy as not beginning until implantation. If they had their way this would be the only definition permitted in medical schools and in the culture in general. That's how they can justify calling the morning after pill "contraception" rather than "abortifacient."
Moral of the story, when you see the word "contraception" you should immediately suspect that it means at least to some degree abortifacient until you have solid evidence to the contrary.
And pro-lifers need to reconsider the way they've let PP drive a wedge within the pro-life movement by using contraception. They've outsmarted pro-lifers because too many Christians have not really thought through the entire sex/procreation interrelationship.
They could also be presciptions for bc pills, packaged for morning after use.