Skip to comments.The Next Failed State: Canada
Posted on 04/27/2005 7:23:29 AM PDT by pabianice
A political specter haunts North America -- the specter of the world's next failed state.
We can still call it Canada, at least for a couple years. And who knows, like news of Mark Twain's demise, my cheeky pessimism may be greatly exaggerated. Our northern neighbor's polyglot populace of beer drinkers, peaceniks, Mounties and socialists may yet dump their crooked politicians and craft a new, more robust deal with Quebecois separatists.
If you don't know about Canada's crooked politicians, you're not alone. Democracy and free speech are breaking out in Beirut, but they're both taking a beating in Ontario. The Canadian government has a press clamp on an investigation into the ruling Liberal Party's "Adscam" kickback scheme. A "judicial publication ban" is the term. It may soon rank with the Watergate rhetoric like "modified limited hang-out." Canadian Prime Minister and Liberal Party leader Paul Martin is implicated in the Adscam fiasco, and he's starting to look like the northland's Richard Nixon.
In the Internet Age, clamps and bans crack quickly, and the Liberals have seen their popular support go poof. A U.S. Web site (www.captainsquartersblog.com), run by Minnesotan Ed Morrissey, started posting leaked statements from the judicial hearings. The Web site instantly became Radio Free Canada and Deep Throat combined, with hundreds of thousands of Canadians going online to read the damning evidence. Now Canadian newspapers are on the story, but it's another case of major media following the Internet's lead. On his Web site, Morrisey sums up Canada's Adscam as "... transfers of cash to the Liberal Party as part of the money-laundering effort ..."
Linda Seebach of the Rocky Mountain News, in a column about Morrissey's coda of Watergate's Woodward and Bernstein, observed that there's "hardly any coverage of what the Canadians call 'AdScam' in the U.S. press, although something that could cause the Canadian government to fall ought to be of interest to that country's southern neighbor ..."
But "federal" Canada remains an iffy proposition, and becomes iffier as the separatist Parti Quebcois (PQ) gains political clout at the expense of the corrupt Liberals.
Bewitched by a Never Land notion of a francophone French Quebec freed from the yoke of "English-speaking" Canada, the PQ radicals regard themselves as culturally unique, prime ethnic candidates for their own nation state and United Nations seat. It's not a new concept. Charles De Gaulle, in a 1967 act of French unilateralism, gave Canadians the jitters when he quipped, "Vive Quebec libre."
What happens to Canada if Quebec secedes? Canadians are once again pondering this question -- live on the CBC -- and given Canada's status as America's number one trading partner and continental neighbor, U.S. citizens should consider the ramifications.
Canadians in the western and maritime provinces already dread the political power of populous Ontario. (Quebec serves as a political balance to Ontario.) If Quebec bids adieu, "remnant" Canada's political rules will be subject to revision. Subsequent regional bickering could lead to further fragmentation.
What might a grand Canadian breakup look like? Jim Dunnigan and I, in the 1991 edition of "A Quick and Dirty Guide to War," played speculative cartographer and redrew Canada's political map.
Here's a thumbnail sketch of that analysis: Say Quebec does become a separate European-style nation-state -- a "people" with cultural, linguistic, religious and historical identity (never mind the objections of Mohawk and Cree Indians living in Quebec). Quebec has the people and resources to make a go of it, though the economic price for its egotism will be stiff. British Columbia also has "nation-state" assets: Access to the sea, strong industrial base, raw materials and an educated population.
Oil-producing Alberta might join the United States and instantly find common political ground with Alaska, Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma. Canada's struggling Atlantic provinces might find statehood economically attractive and extend the New England coastline. A rump Canada consisting of "Greater Ontario" -- with remaining provinces as appendages -- might keep the maple-leaf flag aloft. As for poor, isolated Newfoundland: Would Great Britain like to reacquire a North American colony?
Ah, Canada. America's remora.
All around the Western world one trend stands clear. Once formerly great bastions of capitalism and democracy that turned from their roots and embraced socialism (read communism light) are steadily failing under their own weight. Canada, Germany, France, and the list goes on and on.
Martin looked all too much like Nixon in his address to the nation...I kept expecting him to sday "I'm not a crook" LOL
However our unprincipled socialist party the NDP has sold their political support to Martin for budgetary concessions to big government social[ist] spending to prop up the Liberal party's minority govt against a Conservative no-confidence vote that would force a June election...
Apparently the NDP position is tantamount to 'we dont care if Martin is an obvious crook whose party's money laundering kickback shenanigans include possible ties between Adscam and the Mafia and the corrupt Oil For Food debacle and god knows what more...as long as we can wh0re ourselves for our pet social[ist] programs we're happy and they can be as crooked as they want skimming from the public purse'...
And of course the Liberals are happy to give the NDP whatever they want to stay in power...afterall its not THEIR money they are buying off the NDP with its the same money the've been ripping off for their party coffers...OURS...
A pox on both their houses...>>>:-(((
1991's Quick and Dirty Guide to War, and its one subsequent update, remains one of the most edifying reads out there.
Please let me know if you want on or off the Adscam ping list.
So...does this mean we can expect an invasion from the north and south borders?
I'm torn on this subject. While a balkanized Canada would solve many things, it would also complicate North American politics and economics immensely. And I'm not sure bringing socialist-conditioned Canadian provinces into the US would help our politics any.
Besides, if Canada hangs together and their "socialist paradise" implodes, we'll see firsthand exactly what would happen to us if the liberal Democrats got their way.
I guess the bottom line is that I don't wish them any ill will, but I also don't want my children and grandchildren paying for the mistakes of Canadians.
What remains of Canada could, if they liked, further prostitute themselves and permit US enemies to establish bases in Canada. Canadians can formalize the moral capitulation they have already made and of which continue to boast to finally cash in on the open contempt they have for their generous and benign US neighbors. It would not be smart, but they could do that. In fact, I am surprised that Mexico has not yet done this, AGAIN..... (because remember, Mexico invited the French to help them with their previous territorial aspirations in N. America.)
"What's a "remora."
A remora is a small fish that swims alongside a patron shark, living off smaller tidbits of food that the shark can't chew.
When? You talking about the French conquest of Mexico during the WBTS? Most Mexicans fought the French and their collaborators.
There were Mexicans who talked to the Germans during WWI about help in the reconquista of the American SW.
In the words of that great American, Triumph the Insult Comic Dog: "Canada is a great nation...for me to poop on!"
RE: Napoleon III..."Napoleons intervention (186167) in the affairs of Mexico... the French troops finally withdrew upon the demand of the United States..."
That's what I meant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.