Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Border Patrol Has Issues with ACLU Operatives in Monitored Sector (Minuteman Project)
AgapePress ^ | April 26, 2005 | Chad Groening

Posted on 04/26/2005 4:29:55 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182

(AgapePress) - The union representing Border Patrol agents in the Tucson sector says its members have had no complaints about the volunteers taking part in the Minuteman Project, which is wrapping up this week in the Arizona desert. But apparently the Border Patrol has had some problems with the ACLU.

Since the first of April, volunteers with the Minuteman Project have been conducting what it refers to as a "citizens' Neighborhood Watch" along the Arizona-Mexico border, looking for illegal immigrants crossing over into the U.S. and reporting those sightings to the Border Patrol. The group reports that as of April 24, 315 Border Patrol apprehensions have been "directly facilitated" by Minuteman volunteers.

Mike Albon is a spokesman for U.S. Border Patrol Local 2544, which represents the agents patrolling the 27-mile sector where the Minuteman volunteers have camped out this month. Albon says there have been no complaints from his rank-and-file about the volunteers' work.

"The Minutemen have not caused any problems for the agents in the field," Albon states. "We have not received any complaints [about] any of their activities being out of line. They have been real supportive of the [Border Patrol] agents in the field."

But the union spokesman says activities in the area by American Civil Liberties Union representatives have been counterproductive. "Apparently trying to catch the Minutemen doing something wrong, [someone] has been going out there and setting off [ground] sensors," he explains. Those actions, he says, have caused extra work for Border Patrol agents in the field. "They're counterproductive in [doing] things like that," he says.

Albon says his union is against any organization that opposes enforcement of American immigration laws. "We are against anything that is anti-enforcement," he remarks. "The union wants the immigration laws enforced -- and if the ACLU is supporting things that are not related to the enforcement of the law and are supporting people who are breaking the law, we do not condone that."

WorldNetDaily reported in March that the Arizona chapter of the ACLU planned to monitor the activities of the Minuteman Project volunteers to "make sure they're not abusing anybody's rights." A spokesman for the ACLU told a local newspaper that a team of attorneys would be ready to file civil cases against project participants should any abuses occur.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: California
KEYWORDS: aclu; aliens; minutemanproject
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: JarheadFromFlorida

Sadly, common sense isn't very common these days.


21 posted on 04/26/2005 5:40:33 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Probably the ACLU crackheads wandering around sensor zones in various states of stoned looking for white castle burgers.


22 posted on 04/26/2005 6:11:45 PM PDT by boofus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I wish people would stop talking about sensors installed by DHS along the border. We don't want the migrants to know about that.


23 posted on 04/26/2005 7:25:07 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpotentRage
OR, that President Bush will make comment...

...or even care!


24 posted on 04/26/2005 7:32:15 PM PDT by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
We don't want the migrants to know about that.

Actually won't make any difference if they do.

25 posted on 04/26/2005 10:04:30 PM PDT by HiJinx (My Momma tol' me that if you gotta sneak, you're wrong...and you know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3rdcanyon; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; ...

Ping....


26 posted on 04/26/2005 10:06:48 PM PDT by HiJinx (My Momma tol' me that if you gotta sneak, you're wrong...and you know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Gee..... imagine that!

Who would have thought that the BP would have a problem with the ACLU.

I always thought Unions and the ACLU were close buddies. </sarcasm


27 posted on 04/26/2005 10:21:52 PM PDT by AZHua87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
The ACLU lost all credibility when they defended NAMBLA.

long live the Minuteman Project!

28 posted on 04/26/2005 10:29:37 PM PDT by janetgreen (Minutman Project - American patriotism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

More good news!


29 posted on 04/26/2005 10:33:51 PM PDT by Serenissima Venezia (Hoping to be a California Vigil Antie for the Minuteman Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182


Commies out !
30 posted on 04/26/2005 10:39:08 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kstewskis

My daughter lives in the area and told me the ACLU and others protesting the minutemen were smoking dope in front of U.S. Customs inspectors very near their building at the border crossing. It seemed to her they intended to get arrested to make a scene, but both Customs and Border Patrol ignored them.


31 posted on 04/26/2005 10:54:37 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

32 posted on 04/27/2005 5:02:35 AM PDT by SAMWolf (Liberal Rule #27 - Conservatives are the enemy. Destroy by any means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RepCath; Liz; IronJack; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; Iris7; wkdaysoff; ApesForEvolution; EdReform; ...

Ping!


33 posted on 04/27/2005 5:40:22 AM PDT by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
You can join the fight against the ACLU and their ilk by becoming involved with and supporting the following organizations:

Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) - http://www.alliancedefensefund.org

Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) - http://www.thomasmore.org

American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) - http://www.aclj.org

The Rutherford Institute - http://www.rutherford.org/

Stop the ACLU Coalition (GREATLY ORGANIZED ACTIVIST SITE..PLEASE JOIN) - http://www.stoptheaclu.org


Here are a few examples of how two of those organizations are fighting back:

ADF Contacts Over 3,600 School Districts Over Attempts To Censor Christmas

ADF: 700 lawyers ready to fight ACLU lawsuits

ADF: Pentagons' Warning About Boyscouts Is Absurd

Thomas More Law Center: Town of Palm Beach Pays $50,000 In Attorney Fees Apologizes To Women In Nativity Lawsuit


Additional information:

The ACLU must be destroyed: Joseph Farah supports Boy Scouts, urges Americans to fight back

Citizens mobilized to stop ACLU (seeks to consign group to 'ash heap of history')

ACLU fulfilling communist agenda

Revealing FACTS on the ACLU from its own writings

See how YOUR Senator or Representative ranks with the ACLU

This yahoo group just started on December 3, 2004 and is looking for new members

Anti-ACLU Page

The Center For Reclaiming America (petitions to congress)

The Becket Fund

Christian Legal Society

Pacific Justice Institute

Landmark Legal Foundation

American Family Assn. Center for Law and Policy

The Liberty Council

ACLU-Watch

ACLU (Know Thine Enemy)

My personal Anti-ACLU Blog


"I seek social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and sole control of those who produced the wealth: communism is the goal." - Roger Baldwin, ACLU founder, Harvard Reunion Book, 1935


"The establishment of an American Soviet government will involve the confiscation of large landed estates in town and country, and also, the whole body to forests, mineral deposits, lakes, rivers and so on." - William Z. Foster, ACLU co-founder and former chairman, Communist Party USA.


Let me know if you would like to join my ACLU ping list


34 posted on 04/27/2005 5:41:23 AM PDT by Jay777 (My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
"....and if the ACLU is supporting things that are not related to the enforcement of the law and are supporting people who are breaking the law, we do not condone that."

So why the kid gloves with the ACLU?

Why are there no arrests?

35 posted on 04/27/2005 5:46:00 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: injin
ACLU weenies making trouble along the border? Tar & feather a few and the rest will leave / flee ;^)

A bath and a breath mint would probably have the same effect.

36 posted on 04/27/2005 6:11:59 AM PDT by kimmie7 (Right now it's "Don't get old in Florida." Soon it'll just be "Don't get old.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver; HiJinx

good question. why the ACLU has such power is beyond me. they are nothing but a bunch of lawyers who seem to hate everything this country stands for. it's a mystery to me.


37 posted on 04/27/2005 6:19:05 AM PDT by sdpatriot (remember waco and ruby ridge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182; injin; JarheadFromFlorida; ImpotentRage; mtbopfuyn; wmileo; Diva Betsy Ross; ...
Among ACLU's founders January 12, 1920, were William Z. Foster, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn and Louis F. Budenz. All three later became prominent leaders of the Communist Party, USA, although Budenz broke with the Party in 1945 and became a militant anti-Communist.

In 1976, Congress passed the Civil Rights Attorneys Fee Awards Act, which was designed to encourage private lawyers to take on suits to protect civil and constitutional rights. The law provides that judges can order federal and state governments to pay legal fees to private lawyers who sued the government and won. The result has been a flood of civil rights cases in federal court. From The New American Feb. 2, 1987

It's an outrage that US law, passed during the Watergate era, allows the ACLU to collect attorney's fees for makework----Christian-hatng lawsuits it itself launches.

That means "values voters" have been footing the bill for the ACLU's launching a juggernaut to remove Ten Commandments images, Christmas creches and Christmas carols, taking God out of the Pledge of Allegiance, and because they claim they have a civil right not to see the Ten Commandments, a civil right not to hear the word “God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, not to see a creche of the Baby Jesus, not to hear Christmas carols. The ACLU has collected a huge amount of our tax dollars in this left-handed fundraiser for the ACLU.

FReepers can silence the ACLU with a bit of activism. We need to insist our Congressmen repeal this abusive law that allows the ACLU to get rich on harassing Christian America. Congress must repeal laws enabling the ACLU's Christian-hating activities. Cut off the ACLU's funds and watch them disappear. Here's what we can do.

Under the aegis of the ACLU's Foundation---worth some $135 million---any number of financial travesties can be hidden. The IRS should determine whether the ACLU is properly accounting for all its tax-funded activities, whether it is inflating legal costs, and whether it is using tax dollars for the purposes stated. We need to know whether the ACLU is engaged in Enron-style accounting and spending practices.

REFERENCE SOURCE FOR ARGUING REPEAL TO CONGRESS

Apparently, when Congress contemplated the fee-shifting bill three decades ago, it never conceived that 42 U.S.C. §1988 would be used to secure fees in esoteric battles over the meaning of the establishment clause of the First Amendment.

The statute gives a court "discretion" to award attorneys' fees to the prevailing party in civil rights cases.

Study of the legislative history of the statute reveals that Congress intended this statute to apply to civil rights abuses, including certain race and sex discrimination cases, but not to arguments about whether Judge Roy Moore is allowed to display the Ten Commandments in the Alabama courthouse.

During the deliberations on the bill, the Senate penned that "in many cases arising under our civil rights laws, the citizen who must sue to enforce the law has little or no money with which to hire a lawyer."[6] In the recent First Amendment lawsuits filed by the ACLU, the tables are turned.

Small school districts and municipalities can either defend lawsuits and risk paying the ACLU's attorneys' fees if they lose, or they can voluntarily submit to the ACLU's view of the Constitution.

Even if lawsuits over the establishment clause somehow fall within 42 U.S.C. §1988, the statute empowers courts with nothing more than "discretion" to award fees.

In these cases, one would expect courts to withhold awarding fees. Since this is not happening, Congress must take immediate action to clarify 42 U.S.C. §1988 to explicitly exclude lawsuits related to the acknowledgement of God.

NOTE: In order to spread this message far and wide, you may have already received it. Sorry about that.

38 posted on 04/27/2005 6:29:18 AM PDT by Liz (A society of sheep must, in time, beget a government of wolves. Bertrand de Jouvenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx


Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Be Ever Vigilant!

Minutemen Patriots ~ Bump!


39 posted on 04/27/2005 7:37:12 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

It happens like clockwork: WHEREVER, WHENEVER someone is not wanted, needed,or of ANY USE, THERE (but probably not THERE ALONE) will you find the ACLU! Gumming up the works, being as obnoxious as possible. This public stance of theirs, comparable to the heedless idiocy of some quixotic naif getting drunk and trying to pick a fight at a biker bar, is going to prove fatal to them, someday soon, I expect.


40 posted on 04/27/2005 7:55:24 AM PDT by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson