Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Undecided Specter could doom GOP
Washington Times ^ | Tuesday, April 26, 2005 | By Charles Hurt

Posted on 04/26/2005 12:58:10 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Badray

*Ping


21 posted on 04/26/2005 4:23:56 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Let's just put it this way.

Spectre can redeem himself for Bork by supporting this. If not, Santorum will probably lose election and Spectre's legacy will be sealed but it will not be the admirable record he hopes to retire with.

I don't think people should assume he'll vote no. Spectre really hasn't been the disrupting factor the other RINO's have been since he received backlash for his comments following the election. This is something that will go down to the wire on what he decides to do.


22 posted on 04/26/2005 4:36:56 AM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

BTTT....


23 posted on 04/26/2005 4:38:31 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mickie

A bump back to you in our beautiful state of PA. The sun is shining today!


24 posted on 04/26/2005 4:48:01 AM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
Going to be in the 70's today. That's good because I'm having a new septic system put in and I was afraid it would rain.

You've posted a few really interesting articles today, thanks.

25 posted on 04/26/2005 5:00:42 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Boy, if only someone had seen this coming maybe we could've put a true PA conservative in office last year... < /sarcasm >


26 posted on 04/26/2005 5:04:07 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
We gain seats in the last election, and we have this debacle, as well as the Bolton Nomination fiasco and illegal immigration which they don't want to touch either. I am so sick of being thwarted by our own senators that I could puke. Why give any money to the NRSC when this is what we get after an election?
27 posted on 04/26/2005 5:27:41 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Remember all the lobbying by MILLIONS of people across the US (every major family group, religious group, etc) to prevent Specter from getting the judiciary chairmanship?

The phone lines at the Capitol switchboard were jammed, almost 24x7 with calls AGAINST giving Specter the chairmanship. But, in typical Washington fashion, the Powers That Be (on our own side, da#n it), decided to do what THEY thought was best - and went completely against public opinion and gave it to him ANYWAY.

Supposedly, he had to write a letter promising to support W's judicial nominees, move them through committee, and generally behave himself.

Predictably, this "promise" wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

So, what would most of us do at this point if Specter doesn't play nice? Yep - we'd nuke his Scottish behind right off the committe, strip him of his chairmanship and run him out of town on a rail.

But our R leadership? Oh, nooooo..that wouldn't be "appropriate".

Our side is getting CREAMED lately. If we don't do something major and show some real leadership, I fear we're gonna get trounced in '06 and '08, because there is a VERY large # of us who have HAD IT with this "leadership" that we put into office in the last election. And we'll be sitting home come next election, DESPITE the consequences.


28 posted on 04/26/2005 5:40:27 AM PDT by jstolzen (All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; PhiKapMom; Joe Brower; OldFriend; Shooter 2.5; rellimpank; Ogie Oglethorpe
Well, well. Who is surpised by this news? How do those NRA members in Pennsylvania feel now, knowing they could have had a real conservative in the Senate if it hadn't been for a little back-scratching on the part of the NRA?

For want of a few hundred votes...

29 posted on 04/26/2005 5:51:25 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
Specter is shit, no question there. One might also ask why George W. Bush traveled to Pennsylvania to also stump for this crud's re-election. I have yet to hear any real answer to that question, either.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

30 posted on 04/26/2005 5:54:01 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

After President Bush supported him, Specter is turning Judgas.


31 posted on 04/26/2005 5:54:38 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; PhiKapMom

Well, yeah. Why DID George W. Bush travel to Pennsylvania to stump for this @$$#01e? And why did Rick Santorum go along with it? I'll betcha "Political Reality" had something to do with it.


32 posted on 04/26/2005 6:00:55 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Thanks for the ping OK

This is the line in the sand - the GOP delivers on judges, or they get dumped out of office. The choice is theirs.


33 posted on 04/26/2005 6:02:44 AM PDT by Ogie Oglethorpe (The people have spoken...the b*stards!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
And .. doom his career .. but I guess we'll find out this week.

Assuming he even lives long enough to finish his current term, there's almost no chance he'll run for office again.

34 posted on 04/26/2005 6:05:20 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ogie Oglethorpe; ancient_geezer; kandb; Honeybunch

You're welcome. The Republicans need to deliver on a couple of other items too, like tax reform and Social Security. Otherwise they're all talk.


35 posted on 04/26/2005 6:08:22 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
".......Spector is turning Judgas".

Well, there's plenty of judgasses that should be turned, but I doubt Spector would turn them the right way.

Leni

36 posted on 04/26/2005 6:08:58 AM PDT by MinuteGal ("The Marines keep coming. We are shooting, but the Marines won't stop !" (Fallujah Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dante3
After President Bush supported him, Specter is turning Judas.

This was eminently predictable, and in fact many people predicted this would happen. Specter is a vile, gutter lowlife who's out for himself and himself only, and he always has been.

37 posted on 04/26/2005 6:09:29 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
So, Specter is putting the screws to the GOP.

Man I am so glad Bush went to bat for him./sarcasm.

I am not surprised. Saddened but not surprised. I am starting to wonder if it really makes any difference who we vote for.
38 posted on 04/26/2005 6:22:18 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Let's leave them before they leave us.

I think they already did.

39 posted on 04/26/2005 6:23:01 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner; PhiKapMom
'I'll betcha "Political Reality" had something to do with it.'

Far more often than I'd like, "political reality" is just an excuse for just "going along to get along", or weakly choosing to go the "path of least resistance". Other times, this term does indeed correctly describe the unfortunate need to compromise.

I consider the President's and the NRA's support of creatures like Specter and Carson are, to me, the former -- no excuses. Perhaps there are things going on there at those high political altitudes that we peons are not even aware of which force these things, but I don't buy that 99% of the time.

But as I said, despite the cases where the GOP and/or the NRA fall down on the job, overall they do one helluva lot better than the alternative, and I believe that as long as we continue to hammer them, things will continue to improve. You can't change any club that you don't belong to, and even then, improvement is measured in millimeters. Unfortunately. But I never saw anything in the real world that was easy, or quick.

Of course, you are free to stamp your feet, hold your ears shut and continue to demand 100% perfection, while we who are involved continue to carry your weight. We are used to it, and it certainly won't stop our slow advance to restore this nation to it's founding concepts.

Be well,

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

40 posted on 04/26/2005 6:24:17 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson