[P_A_I]

This employer is not insuring tranquility, nor promoting our general welfare by curtailing the blessings of liberty his employees enjoy.

With all due respect, you need a remedial class on the constitution.

'With all due respect', your remark on needing a remedial class on the constitution merely shows that you can't counter the logic of my comment.

[Modernman]

'With all due respect', your remark on needing a remedial class on the constitution merely shows that you can't counter the logic of my comment.

Do you believe that the Constitution covers relations between private parties?

So, if a Wal-Mart employee spends his off-hours running an anti-Wal-Mart website, if Wal-Mart fired him that would be a violation of his 1st Amendment rights?

[Protagoras]

'With all due respect', your remark on needing a remedial class on the constitution merely shows that you can't counter the logic of my comment.

There is no logic to your positions because there is no facts behind them.

No employer has any obligation to promote any welfare whatsoever much less the general welfare, nor any obligation to insure tranquility, nor secure any blessings of liberty.

Seriously, you have a flawed understanding of the constitution. Actually, no understanding that can be detected.