The numbers are, of course, listeners in millions.
Dr. Savage and Medved are the only one's worth listening to anymore.
It should read: Don Imus (non-sensical)
A clear-thinking liberal Democrat has the opportunity here. The trouble is that there are few of them.
Howard Stern' ideology shows through frequently and he is NOT a conservative.
Huh. I would think at least some of those "non-politicals" or "non-ideologicals" should be classified as liberal.
24. Dr. Dean Edell (Non-political)
BS.
Michael Savage is NO CONSERVATIVE!
Whoever said that clearly hasn't listened to him.
LOL.
BUMP
Some of those so-called "non-ideologicals" are indeed liberals.
I would have thought that Laura Ingraham would be higher.
So the socialists don't listen to the radio. What a surprise!. If they did, they would get the facts and wouldn't be socialists anymore!. How easy it is to brain wash ignorants!.
If Howard Stern is "non-ideological", then I'm from the planet Jupiter.
I'm surprised Glenn Beck isn't higher up the list. He airs here in Atlanta, and I think he is great ... more fun to listen to than Boortz.
Doug Stephan and Nancy Skinner (Non-ideological)
I would disagree on this one...at least with Nancy Skinner, who is nothing more than Hillary-lite. BTW, she and Doug are no longer on together. I think she has her own show (which we are blessed to NOT get in Amarillo).
Another BTW: Did anyone hear Stephan the morning he revealed that he and Nancy Skinner had been an "item" for awhile? Had a little "involvement" going on!
Medved only gets 1.5 million? Man, that's a shame.. They need to get him on more stations.
It figures, my two favorites - Prager and Hewitt - are not on the list.
NANCY SKINNER (non-ideological)
THAT'S GREAT!!!! She ran as a Democrat for Senate in Illinois. She was a liberal voice on WLS in Chicago. What a joke!!! Who assigned the labels here, Tom Harkin, the "conservative." HA!