Posted on 04/14/2005 9:16:57 PM PDT by CHARLITE
....and he would have been faithful if not for Monica, yuk, yuk.
Oh, is that what happened? No wonder I'm confused :)
Sure -- if he could have kept his bent dick zipped up..
But -- He didn't.....
Proving he was an inexcusable jerk.... Literally.
Semper Fi
What a load of FECES. ROTFLMAO.
I'm glad I read the article before responding to the title.
There it is.
"For those who are vomiting and worse, might I suggest that you read the entire article? The title and introduction are meant to be humorous and ironic."
"For those who are vomiting and worse, might I suggest that you read the entire article? The title and introduction are meant to be humorous and ironic."
Proudly responding without reading the article since 1998.
;O)
LOL!
Check Posts # 9 and 10. Perhaps you are reacting to the very S.F.Chronicle article which Noel is criticizing in his piece. His column is a rebuttal to the pro-Clinton liberal Chronicle writer's apologia for Clinton's failures.
Tell your friend Noel Sheppard that I enjoyed this piece, and that I thought the title was clever.
FWIW.
Thank you so much. I appreciate the time that you took, Scott, to write such a kind reply. Noel IS very clever. He's as good a writer as he is an excellent economist. Unfortunately, too many people only read the title and/or a few sentences, so if a column is wry, comical, satirical or tongue-in-cheek, people don't get it and then spit all over the writer without actually reading the article.
As the expression goes........."Sheesh!"
Thanks again for your response.
Char :)
I guess I am just agreeing with him. Remember what Barney Frank said after we initially ran over Saddom's forces. He claimed the war was succesful because that Bush used the Army Clinton created and trained for him. These people have no shame.
You're very welcome. I'll stand up for my fellow FReepers, though, in saying that they're probably just tired of all of the revisionist spin and assumed that it was just more of the same.
It happens.
GET A BILL STARTED TO PLACE ALL POLITICIANS ON SOCIAL SECURITY
This must be an issue in "2008 ". Please! Keep it going.
SOCIAL SECURITY:
(This is worth reading. It is short and to the point.)
Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.
Our Senators and Congresswomen do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it.
You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan.
In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.
For all practical purposes their plan works like this:
When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die.
Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments..
This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries. For example, Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000.00 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives.
Younger Dignitaries, who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives.
Their cost for this excellent plan is $0.00. NADA....ZILCH....
This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds;
"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK"!
From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, -every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer)-we can expect to get an average of $1,000 per month after retirement.
Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator! Bill Bradley's benefits!
Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made.
That change would be to:
Jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us.
then sit back.....
and watch how fast they would fix it.
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted
and maybe good changes will evolve.
How many people can YOU send this to?
Better yet.....
How many people WILL you send this to??
Keep this going clear up thru the 2008 election!! We need to be heard!!
What a pile of rubbish.
This goes to show just how desperate these Democrats are to get some attention.
Clinton could have avoided the whole scandel if he had only told the truth. How come he never had that foresight?
As it was, he had plenty of time before his dirty laundry was exposed to put a proposal (that he never had) forward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.