Women confide personal information regarding their inner most thoughts to their female friends a lot.
In some cases much more so then their husbands, especially if they are considering divorce.
Why then was the testimony of Terri's best female friend not allowed?
That friend's affidavit stated that Terri would not have wanted to die even in a coma (which she was not in) and that Terri actually stated herself after watching the Karen Q movie, "Where there's life, there's hope".
Greer did not allow the friend's testimony.
How did Micheal's relatives know better than Terri's female friend and why did their testimony have more leverage with Greer??
How many people do you know who actually tell their in-laws more than their best friends?
I have a severe problem with Greer's "fact" finding because it defies basic logic.
I agree with you that the question is if Terri wanted to live as she was. The problem is a lot of people are letting their personal thoughts on how they would view living in Terri's state get in their way.
...because unfortunately Terri was unable to speak for herself.