Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose

"Ooopsie."

Shame they didn't use a tank to shoot him, if true.


2 posted on 04/08/2005 11:47:38 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

58 posted on 04/08/2005 12:01:27 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

Doesn't matter whether he was on their side or not...if he was really shot by US troops then it was Bush's fault. And the people involved will be Court marshalled...

Hell, the aren't even allowed to shoot the ENEMY, much less that poor innocent reporter.


153 posted on 04/08/2005 1:57:14 PM PDT by melbell (A Freudian slip is when you mean one thing, and say your mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
"Ooopsie."

Shame they didn't use a tank to shoot him, if true.

 

You mean like this?

 

Movies/rifletank_1.mpeg

295 posted on 04/12/2005 7:36:53 PM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr
"Ooopsie."

Shame they didn't use a tank to shoot him, if true.

 

You mean like this?

Movies/rifletank_1.mpeg

 

Note: just like never bringing a knife to a gunfight, it doesn't pay to bring a rifle to a tank fight.


296 posted on 04/12/2005 7:41:53 PM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Spktyr

No, not a SeeBS reporter. Dan Blather will be proud.


301 posted on 04/14/2005 12:45:13 AM PDT by conshack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson