Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Granddaughter yanks grandma's feeding tube
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 7, 2005 | Sarah Foster

Posted on 04/07/2005 5:34:06 PM PDT by News Hunter

Edited on 04/07/2005 5:39:05 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721-727 next last
To: News Hunter
Beth Gaddy - Proud Wild Turkey and WPPFF Member

"Oh what a wicked slippery slope we slide, when we first practice euthanasiacide."

I know that's not a word, but it's got to rhyme.

41 posted on 04/07/2005 6:00:42 PM PDT by MrDem (Monthly Special: Will write OPUS's for Whiners and Crybabies for no charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

Sorry for double posting info. did look for any freepers from other thread. Missed this, I'm sorry.


42 posted on 04/07/2005 6:00:59 PM PDT by mother22wife21 ( "He's down by the river, walkin' on the water")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
why you think there's something missing here

I obviously have no direct or inside information, but my first problem comes with the suggestion that a hospital did not distinguish one kind of POA from another as this is very easy and they are exposing themselves to liability for a mistake like this so are motivated to take care. Second, the hospital would know whether a patient was terminal and that the purpose of a transfer to hospice is meant for terminal patients which would raise all kinds of red flags. Then, admission to a hospice requires very specific documentation, and I don't see that referenced. Just a few things that got my attention.

43 posted on 04/07/2005 6:01:17 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

that makes sense.


44 posted on 04/07/2005 6:01:24 PM PDT by queenkathy (Can't think of anything cute for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

Who cares? Old people are a drain on society anyway. Who else is gonna be next? <\ liberal mode>


45 posted on 04/07/2005 6:02:45 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

OMG. I'm sick - again. Literally sick over this. I just don't understand people like this.


46 posted on 04/07/2005 6:03:55 PM PDT by Wneighbor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

That's not the way I read it. What "facts" are missing? The family went to the hospice to ask for her release (let's face it, in her condition, deprived of food & water and being force-fed pain medication) they can't just pile into the family station wagon and drive granny to the hospital. Surely you as an astute, logical, nonhysterical observer can figure that one out. They arranged for her to be transferred to another facility. While her release was supposedly being taken care of, darling granddaughter, who considered grandma an "incovenience" went before a judge to gain power of attorney over her. In spite of granny's living will, in spite of a WRITTEN document stating who was to make medical decisions for her and the kind of care she wanted, the judge ruled in favor of the granddaughter. Wasn't part of the mantra during the "kill Terri" lectures that she should have had a living will? Fat lot of good it's doing granny. If this kind of thing doesn't happen and these people are just being hysterical, why then does the hospice Terri died at have to pay the federal government back for committing just this kind of fraud?

Cindie


47 posted on 04/07/2005 6:04:01 PM PDT by gardencatz (I may look like a girl but I'm not, I'm a cyborg! -- Katsura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Oh, goodness. A modern children's story.


48 posted on 04/07/2005 6:04:19 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter; Eaker; habs4ever; Ditter; shaggy eel; dorben; Son of Rooster; Tennessee_Bob; Cyrano; ..
Well well well, who woulda thunk?
49 posted on 04/07/2005 6:05:09 PM PDT by Terriergal (What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
This is absolutely outrageous...

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

50 posted on 04/07/2005 6:05:20 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; jwalsh07; floriduh voter; FL_engineer

This is absolutely outrageous...


51 posted on 04/07/2005 6:06:07 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Second, the hospital would know whether a patient was terminal and that the purpose of a transfer to hospice is meant for terminal patients which would raise all kinds of red flags. Then, admission to a hospice requires very specific documentation, and I don't see that referenced. Just a few things that got my attention.

Aside from wondering if the entire story is a hoax, I did notice that the hospital and hospice are in the same family. And, if the hospital and hospice were told that granny was going to be taken off feeding, then according to the law, she was terminal. That's how it worked for Terri too. Scheduled natural death by starvation is adequate grounds for hospice admission. The mistake, as you pointed out, would have been to take a general POA as a medical one.

I can't figure out the reference to Florida either. Isn't this story set in Georgia?

52 posted on 04/07/2005 6:06:44 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

There does seem to be a bit of evil entwined in the story. Imagine the granddaughter getting custody for a weekend only, but promptly having the tube removed. Amazing!


53 posted on 04/07/2005 6:07:44 PM PDT by Enterprise (Abortion and "euthanasia" - the twin destroyers of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Well. I don't like WND as a source because they're awful. But taking this at face value, it's worse than the Schiavo case. Nobody is apparently alleging that the woman is either terminal nor in a PVS.

If this is true, it must be stopped. If this is WND selective reporting of facts, that should be stopped, too.

54 posted on 04/07/2005 6:08:06 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: News Hunter

How long before we hear Felos is representing Gaddy?


55 posted on 04/07/2005 6:09:43 PM PDT by uvular
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz
A living will does no good even if you place in front of the judge yourself. If your granddaughter wants to spread her legs for the judge, and he does probate, you're going down.

Since nothing has changed in the way probate and guardianship has happened for hundreds of years, the problem of showing up dead must have some other cause.

May I suggest that it's the hospice concept from the get-go!

These people are in the business of death. They can't help it.

Whatever benefit folks think hospice care brings, it's pretty clear they will need to be razed to the ground and their practitioners scattered.

56 posted on 04/07/2005 6:09:56 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Glaucoma is not a terminal disease. Being 81 is not a terminal disease. Being blind and alive gets you extra IRS deductions.
57 posted on 04/07/2005 6:10:27 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Yeah...me too. I'm going to have to do some research on this- something doesn't fit here. This is wild.


58 posted on 04/07/2005 6:10:39 PM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sport
55? Not even close. :^)


59 posted on 04/07/2005 6:11:40 PM PDT by TheDon (Euthanasia is an atrocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
Glaucoma is not a terminal disease. Being 81 is not a terminal disease. Being blind and alive gets you extra IRS deductions

I hope you don't think I suggested any of these things in anything that I said.

60 posted on 04/07/2005 6:11:49 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721-727 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson