Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beat to Quarters (FR mentioned)
Belmont Club ^ | April 4, 2005 | wretchard

Posted on 04/04/2005 11:03:50 AM PDT by prairiebreeze

Captain's Quarters has really stirred up the Canadian blogosphere by carrying details of court testimony on a governmental scandal that is banned from publication in the Great White North. The scandal is about the use of Canadian government money, laundered through a private ad agency, to hire Liberal Party hacks, and is so serious it may catapault the Canadian conservatives into power. This incident marks one more step by the blogosphere into the realm of news generation as opposed to mere commentary. Captain Ed is well aware of this and adds the uncustomary (for a blog) disclaimer:

Thanks to a friend of mine, CQ readers can get a taste of what Brault has already told the Gomery Commission. For obvious reasons, I cannot reveal this person's name or position, but this person is in a position to have the information. Bear in mind that this comes from a single source, so while I have confidence in the information, you should consider the sourcing carefully.

The information seems to be regarded as accurate by Canadian bloggers (who quite bizarrely refer to Captain Ed's post in the third person without discussing it) because it conforms to much that is already known. ('It seems accurate, you know, the post people are referring to here, the one we can't reproduce.') which makes its role in the news cycle doubly interesting. Like the Rathergate and Swiftvets story, the scene seems set for an invisible and unacknowledged meme to exert a powerful influence on mainstream news. One poster at Free Dominion said Canada was about to experience the power of the American blogosphere.

The idea of an 'American blogosphere' is a curious concept. One Canadian poster, who balked at relating what he knew about the Liberal Party scandal on the Free Dominion because of the publication ban, suggested he and his buddies continue their conversation at the FreeRepublic, like they were crossing the border and going from Windsor to Detroit. Whether that made it all nice and legal I'll leave to the lawyers but a certain amount of absurdity suggested itself in the situation.

This highlights the impact that Internet self-publishing has had in breaking down political systems, whether peaceably (as in the case of Canada and the US) or not-so-peaceably as exemplified by Iran. Because the exercise of authority consists largely of information control (rather than physical control) by the State, Internet self-publishing has effectively weakened large areas of state power by weakening those controls. As a practical matter, there is not a judge in the world that can realistically enforce a gag order unless he can a) prevent the source leak or b) force compliance on all continents and seas of the planet earth.

Update

Belmont Club commenter Veseng brings up a proposed San Francisco ordinance which would require the registration of blogs as a way of controlling campaign speech. According to page 4 of the draft ordinance it appears to refer to:

"any communication, including but not limited to any broadcast, cable, satellite, radio, internet, or telephone communcation, and any mailing, flyer, doorhanger, pamphlet, brochure, card, sign, billboard, facsimile, or printed advertisement, that: a) refers to a clearly identified candidate for City elective office or a City elective officer who is the subject of a recall election; and b) is distributed within 9 days prior to an election for the City elective office ..."

San Francisco officials will face the same difficulties (assuming the ordinance passes) that the Canadian judge who issued the gag order encountered. How will San Francisco regulate a blog hosted in say, Canada posting information about a municipal candidate? Part of the problem is that the Internet was designed to provide multiple pathways to information. (It was originally designed as a nuclear-war resistant architecture) As the logical and physical infrastructure grows those pathways multiply. Any serious attempt to control information flows on the Internet will effectively require a redesign so that it can be throttled, the very thing it was intended to prevent. Although they are not strictly comparable, the Internet has become, along with that other military invention, GPS, too valuable to cripple. Entire businesses worth hundreds of billions are now critically dependent on existing Internet protocols and any really effective controls will come at a very high cost.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adscam; belmontclub; blogosphere; campaignfinance; canada; captainsquarters; fr; freedominion; freespeech; gagorder; govwatch; internetregulation; judge; sanfrancisco; scandal
Like the Rathergate and Swiftvets story, the scene seems set for an invisible and unacknowledged meme to exert a powerful influence on mainstream news. One poster at Free Dominion said Canada was about to experience the power of the American blogosphere.

No one escapes the long arm and eye of the pajamahadeen. No one. Bwahahaha!

1 posted on 04/04/2005 11:03:51 AM PDT by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

The fact that they have to discuss a major issue affecting their own government over here because it would be illegal to do so over there puts the lie to any claim that Canada is a free country. Socialism enslaves.


2 posted on 04/04/2005 11:10:52 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("The Passion of the Opus" - 2 hours of a FReeper being crucified on his own self-pitying thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Yep! You have to get up pretty early to fool the "The pajamahadeen Brigade(a group of people organized for special activity) "...bawhahahha!
3 posted on 04/04/2005 11:15:30 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Yep! You have to get up pretty early to fool the "The pajamahadeen Brigade(a group of people organized for special activity) "...bawhahahha!
4 posted on 04/04/2005 11:15:52 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Bump, accurate observation.


5 posted on 04/04/2005 11:19:40 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Does my American flag offend you? Dial 1-800-LEAVE THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

No country is truely free. But Canada has opted to have even less freedom by restricting freedom of speech.


6 posted on 04/04/2005 11:28:47 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

It may not happen this time, but you just watch:

At some point in the future (and this would likely happen if the corrupt Liberals are still in power) when a 'gag order' or 'publication ban' is in place, Canadian ISPs may be directed to block websites like FR or other American websites/blogs/news resources in order to enforce whatever ban is in effect.

There are not that many major Canadian ISPs (compared to the US), and they don't want to incur the wrath of their imperial masters in Ottawa.


7 posted on 04/04/2005 11:44:47 AM PDT by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Sounds like Canada's subjects need a 'first amendment' -- then maybe they can become Canada's citizens.


8 posted on 04/04/2005 12:25:09 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada; Ashamed Canadian

fyi


9 posted on 04/04/2005 6:36:38 PM PDT by GretchenM (Threadbare tagline taken down for repair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Did somebody mention

... the Pajamahadeen?!!

10 posted on 04/04/2005 6:39:22 PM PDT by theDentist (The Dems are putting all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Because the exercise of authority consists largely of information control (rather than physical control) by the State, Internet self-publishing has effectively weakened large areas of state power by weakening those controls.

That is precisely why this - place, for want of a better word - must be defended, fiercely if necessary, for the attacks on it will increase in their desperation as those who would protect corruption realize that their game is threatened.

The San Francisco ordinance is only the beginning. China has suggested that the UN be given control of the Internet. Mainstream journalists in the United States have suggested it be "regulated." I would look for such demands from an insanely regulation-happy EU.

They must be refused. This is not chaos, this is not anarchy, this is FREEDOM.

11 posted on 04/04/2005 6:49:08 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They would need a 2nd amendment to keep the 1st.


12 posted on 04/04/2005 6:54:48 PM PDT by deaconjim (Freep the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Allan

Bump


13 posted on 04/04/2005 6:55:49 PM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Internet2 is already in the pipeline. Bigger, faster, etc. The powers that think they matter can't win.


14 posted on 04/05/2005 2:55:21 PM PDT by rasblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

>>>> As a practical matter, there is not a judge in the world that can realistically enforce a gag order unless he can a) prevent the source leak or b) force compliance on all continents and seas of the planet earth.>>>>

The present discussion aside, the above quote is EXACTLY why the UN should NEVER be allowed to control the internet, not even as to their current attempt to control who gets URLs.


15 posted on 08/04/2005 12:50:33 PM PDT by kitkat ("We're not going to let anybody frighten us from our great love of freedom." GWB, 7/22/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Thanks for posting this, Prairie. Good work!


16 posted on 08/04/2005 12:54:39 PM PDT by kitkat ("We're not going to let anybody frighten us from our great love of freedom." GWB, 7/22/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson