Posted on 04/03/2005 9:43:00 AM PDT by bitt
Thanks, Endangered Mindz. Very good. :)Welcome to FreeRepublic.com.
No... the Burglars, burgling is not Bush fault..
BUT letting the Burglar off WILL BE Bush's FAULT.. Its his watch..
And if he does, I hope he strangles on, "I'm a Uniter'er not a divider"..
Thanks for the ping. Good stuff.
I see a whole Watergate-type investigation going on with all the lib papers headlining stories about Deep Throat types, and Woodward and Bernstein-style reporters working around the clock to get at the truth, and all the alphabet networks deluging us with nightly stories about the goings on in the Clinton White House....ok, so I'm hallucinating.
It's Bush's DoJ isn't it?
Can I wish Hillary on both of you all without wishing her on me as well?
Bush continues to waste what little political capital he has left by going weak on matters requiring a strong principled stand. In case the White House hasn't figured it out yet, as far as conservatives (at least 30% of the base) are concerned, we don't give a rats ass about "compassionate conservatism" and "new tone in Washington". What we want to see is no bullsh** strong action being taken on the issues that matter.
Sandy Berger, like most everyone associated with the Clintons, is a felon just waiting for an indictment on a wide assortment of charges. They are all treasonous scum and deserve the harshest possible treatment.
May that witch lift her dress and fan the odor in YOUR direction..
as you toast her campaign run with anchovy wine.. d;-'~ Nyah
Your reply was way more classy than that of the other guy.
But I think you people expect way too much of Bush. He's getting there. He can't be a dictator. He's been a lot kinder to the Clintonistas than I would like, but there is probably method in his madness.
I love Bush and I just get really sick of the Bush bashing that's been prevalent lately. I should probably just ignore it.
He has shied away from some hard issues (e.g., CFR), made some bad decisions (e.g., supporting affirmative action; defacto amnesty for illegal aliens) and has pushed big government (e.g., education bill, greatly expanded Medicare entitlement, etc.). All of this continues to grate on conservatives who feel they've been sold out.
Now, he's making it worse--much worse--by giving Sandy "Burglar" a wrist slap instead of throwing the book at this disloyal criminal. If some hapless aerospace engineer had done the same thing, he would have lost his security clearance, his job and been criminally prosecuted in the toughest possible manner, winding up with more than a few years in federal prison.
This is another case of Washington protecting Washington insiders. It's disgusting and it's wrong. It diminishes trust in the federal government and makes a mockery of the rule of law that Washington is forever pontificating about. And it is valid to criticize the Bush administration for going in the tank for this worthless skunk.
Obviously you have valid concerns and I share some of them.
It's just that there seems to be a group of people on Free Republic now who never liked Bush and who are using the Terri and immigration stuff as an opportunity to bash him on every thread.
I can't even read some of the threads I would ordinarily enjoy because when I see that, it hurts me.
I know he's not perfect, but I just hate so much criticism here on Free Republic. The MSM and the dems do that so constantly, I guess I would just like a haven from it.
But thanks for taking the time to give a good explanation of your views.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.