I beg to differ:
1. The Judgenfuhrer and federal judges ignored a Congressional subpoena, did they not?
2. The FLA law references unnatural feeding [the feeding tube] so removing the feeding tube was legal. But how could the Judgenfuhrer deny natural feeding, by mouth? On what basis? Terri could swallow and previously had Jell-o cubes. I don't understand the legal basis to deny feeding and hydration by natural means.
Legal murder.
It doesn't matter what laws are passed, or how Constitutions (State or Federal) are amended. The judiciary has the last say in how they interpret it. Too bad for the government OF the people BY the people. Is that what we've come down to?
BTW, where is the Tyranny Response Team?