Does anyone know why the 'husband' cannot be divorced since he is living with another woman?
Because he cannot be forced to do so.
He Terri's family can hold an autopsy utilizing their own chosen pathologist & medical team and the results show undeniable broken bones, which can also be positively per-dated to her unexplained 'loss of oxygen' to the brain, 'husband' is going to be confronted with serious hard time, provided the jury & whomever the judge shall be, will not be bought off.
Good question. All thru this case, many say that it is the law that Judge Greer has followed and that is why he ruled the way he did, of course backed up by federal courts. But the question does arise on the subject of adultery and the law. First we must examine what adultery is and secondly it begs the question of, who is adultery committed against, the state or an individual? I believe that adultery is a crime against an individual and in this case against Terri. Therefore, it is reasonable to deduct that when a crime is committed against an individual, the criminal cannot be the gaurdian of the victim.