Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Antoninus
If he really wanted to, Jeb could prevent this woman from being starved to death right now, this second.

Sure he could. Break the law and do it. He could also be impeached over it.

The pro-lifers already risk losing ground over this issue. We really don't need a lawless governor further damaging the credibility of those who stand for life.

78 posted on 03/25/2005 1:11:54 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

Dear sinkspur,

"The pro-lifers already risk losing ground over this issue."

Just what would be lost?

Perhaps abortion on demand might be legalized? Oh wait, the robed tyrants already did that.

Perhaps parents might have no say in their 11 year old daughters having abortions? Oh wait, the robed tyrants already did that.

Perhaps abortionists will be permitted to deliver a baby, at full term, only to stick a pair of scissors into the back of her skull, and suck her brains out? Oh wait, the robed tyrants already did that.

Perhaps disabled people will be starved to death, so that faithless husbands can keep the money for their whores and bastards? Oh wait, the robed tyrants already did that.

Perhaps judges will use the falsified testimony of lawless murderers to justify their murder? Oh wait, the robed tyrants already did that.

Perhaps judges will begin to deny that the people, through their elected representatives, have the power of self-government any longer? Perhaps the judges will appoint themselves our masters, superior to our legislatures and executives? Oh wait, the robed tyrants already did that.

And in not taking Terri into protective custody, and having the murderer greer arrested for violating state law, Gov. Bush has enabled the last item. And in not sending federal marshals to protect Terri, and to arrest the murderer greer for contempt of Congress and violation of federal law, President Bush has also enabled that last item.

They're all hat, no cattle.


sitetest


81 posted on 03/25/2005 1:26:54 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Sure he could. Break the law and do it.

A human law that violates natural law is void. A Catholic is not only not obliged to follow such an immoral law, but they are OBLIGED to disobey it.

He could also be impeached over it.

If you believe that, you're nuts.

The pro-lifers already risk losing ground over this issue. We really don't need a lawless governor further damaging the credibility of those who stand for life.

Free advice given by an enemy is worth what you pay for it. Weren't you the guy who had grave doubts about Humanae Vitae? For you, the time to stand up and defend innocent life is apparently never.
89 posted on 03/25/2005 2:18:42 PM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
He could also be impeached over it.

So what? He's termed out.

111 posted on 03/25/2005 7:28:27 PM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson