Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeb Bush may take Terri Schiavo into state care
Times On Line.UK ^ | 3/25/2005 | Jenny Booth, Times Online and Tim Reid

Posted on 03/25/2005 4:33:23 AM PST by ex-Texan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-258 next last
To: ex-Texan

I don't know about the rest of you, but this business from the MSM about the fanatical religious right and extreme religious community interfering with the husband's wishes is starting to grate on my nerves. As much as I have respected Mort Kondracke, last evening on the Britt Hume show, Mort came out first with the statement about the religious right trying to influence the outcome of Terri Schavio. Then Juan Williams piled on about the right-wing conservative movement trying to make this political. Really honked me off....this is about life....


61 posted on 03/25/2005 5:18:28 AM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Pontius Pilate did not decide--he deferred to angry religious authorities meanwhile protesting that Jesus had done no wrong and did not deserve to die. I do think that if Pilate had said no and taken Jesus into Roman custody, Jesus' death would have been forestalled as he had not committed any crime under Roman law.

Jeb Bush must have a tortured soul today. May God give him strength.


62 posted on 03/25/2005 5:20:31 AM PST by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Military family member

There are not many protestors there. Not hundreds by any count, probably dozens like you've mentioned. I've been tuning in to WFLA 970 and they have someone on the scene.
They report, the same faces, and "dozens" of people.


There's a "listen live" link on their website and they've had somebody at the hospice round the clock reporting on the situation every half hour.

http://www.970wfla.com/


63 posted on 03/25/2005 5:20:54 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk

If you think we are a nation of laws, why has Judge Greer gotten by with allowing MS to not file plans of care yearly AS REQUIRED BY LAW. The law is in place to protect the disabled from abuse and neglect. As long as Terri is alive she had the RIGHT to be cared for according to the guarentees in the LAW. In othe words as long as the court fights were going on she should have recieved PT, OT, feeding therpies if necessary, medical care, dental care ...stuff like that. This is wrong just based on the fact that the judge approved denial of services.

Having said that Gov. Bush and the legislature should have pulled out all stops and authrorized overtime for the DFC to get their report done quickly. I really think that it could be proven she was neglected, then it would be possible for them to intervene, but that wasn't done, they decided to plod through the process....so Terri will probably die since on one seems to think she should at least get to live while the investigation is going on.

tell me, do you want to know the results of that investigation? I do, even if Terri doen't make it. I want to know if she was treated as required under the laws dealing with vulnerable adults. Just because a judge says treatment can be denied (PT,OT, ST, medical etc etc) should not mean it can, since it breaks the LAW. ...which you seem to think shouldn't be done. I pray that God continues to hold her in His hands and comfort her when she is probably going through hell here on earth.

Gee if I treated any of my animals this way i'd be fined and probably put in jail. Why is it ok to treat a human by not even offering food or drink by mouth?


64 posted on 03/25/2005 5:23:57 AM PST by tickles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Post5203
If nothing else, Clinton gets credit for having a set.

I can't help but think about how much power the President has. See if this picture brings back any memories. I believe W or Jeb could call on his police powers to save someone's life.


65 posted on 03/25/2005 5:24:01 AM PST by Alright2BRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Which truly makes me wonder if the polls are accurate.

Consider this: if the public outcry was as great as people here believe it to be, then why aren't people lined up around the block to protest? Where is the outrage?

Even people in the area aren't going. I haven't seen a single FR sign posted anywhere and they usually are. As far as I can tell the outrage matches the polling data.

I don't like that thought, but I see little to dispute it.

66 posted on 03/25/2005 5:25:59 AM PST by Military family member (If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Thug_Mom

“Jeb has gone so far as to anger some by his actions in this case. He might as well go all the way, save Terri's life, and flip his nose at those who don't want him to stop her "dying" when they see her doing well in rehab, the judge impeached, etc.”

You are correct. At this point, he has nothing to lose; and if he wins, he has everything to gain because this is now a national issue.

As Adm. David Glasgow Farragut said, "Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!" (mines were known as “torpedoes” then.) With that decision, he won the Battle of Mobile Bay and became and is a legend to this day.

So, Jeb, are you going to become a legend by damning the torpedoes? If you don’t, you will never know if you would have won the battle, but you definitely will have lost it.


67 posted on 03/25/2005 5:26:03 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Gov. Jeb Bush...says he "cannot go beyond what my powers are."

under Florida law, the governor has the power, without court clearance, of taking a citizen into custody for a 24-hour appraisal if it is suspected they are in jeopardy

According to that last statement he has not done all he can do.

68 posted on 03/25/2005 5:27:23 AM PST by PistolPaknMama (Will work for cool tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tickles
Is Michael Schiavo required to file the plans, or is the hospice required to file the plans?

Not trying to be difficult, just seeking information

69 posted on 03/25/2005 5:28:09 AM PST by Military family member (If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Pinetop
Pontius Pilate did not decide--he deferred to angry religious authorities meanwhile protesting that Jesus had done no wrong and did not deserve to die. I do think that if Pilate had said no and taken Jesus into Roman custody, Jesus' death would have been forestalled as he had not committed any crime under Roman law

Jesus said, "No one takes My life from me, but I lay it down of My own accord. I have power to lay it down and the power to take it up again. This command is from My Father."

He had already told His disciples what was going to happen.

Pilate was just a player in the drama.

Even if he had released Jesus, he couldn't have forestalled his death.

70 posted on 03/25/2005 5:28:27 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: toadthesecond

I hate to agree with yo but you may be right.
IMHO Easter Sunday will be the test. If the hospice is not surrounded by those that truly care for Terri than my hopes dim, actually they already have.


71 posted on 03/25/2005 5:29:47 AM PST by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smiley
The Liberals & the MSM are the ones making this political! You can see the smug smiles on their faces, they are so happy this is happening!

(rubbing hands together)"We've got em now! Let's see the Bush brothers get out of this one!"

Of course they're willing to sacrifice Terri to do it. First they prime the sheeple by having an Oscar winning movie EXPLAIN it all to us so we can see that Right to Die is a beautiful thing.

Abortion was their answer for welfare & now Euthanasia is their answer for Social Security.

72 posted on 03/25/2005 5:29:50 AM PST by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
"People are very angry all across the country"

For the majority of the electorate, this will blow over as soon as the media finds the next "crisis" to sensationalize.

Soon, we will be returning to the issues of illegal immigration, fuel prices, and tax returns.

73 posted on 03/25/2005 5:29:59 AM PST by verity (The Liberal Media and the ACLU are America's Enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Subject: Shiavo review of guardianship

Governor Jeb Bush, jeb.bush@myflorida.com

Friday, March 25, 2005

The court, in 1997 when Michael announced he was'engaged' should have immediately conducted a guardianship hearing and transfered Terri to State guardianship. Because of this failure, we are in the present situation.

Questions you might consider:

(1) Why did Michael choose to 'ignore' her wishes for nearly 7 years until 1997 when he announced he was'engaged' to Jodi Centonze and 'suddenly' remembered the conversation about life support with Terri from years before?

Michael Schiavo answer would probably rationalize that it took that long before he realized there was 'no hope for recovery...'

(2) However, the 1992 malpractice suit for $20 million was based on the premise/conclusion that Terri would NOT recover and she would require constant medical care for the remainder of her life estimated by Michael Shiavo and his laywers to be 51 years(which is the normal life expectancey)...Where were her WISHES at that time?

(3) The court, in 1997 when Michael announced he was'engaged' should have immediately conducted a guardianship hearing and transfered Terri to State guardianship, at a minimum because of the obvious conflict of interest on the part of Michael Shiavo.

The court system failed to act at that point, and that is a major factor on why we are at the point we are today.

Guardianship, by law and practice, is determined to be given to that person who is most heavily 'biased' in favor of the disabled person. Under most conditions this would be the spouse. However, most prudent courts, if during the guardianship period, the appointed guardian by circumstances or accident tilts the 'bias' away from the interest of the person so guarded, would conduct and immediate review, and at a minimum, transfer guardianship to the appropriate State agency.

hope this is useful

Van & Katherine Jenerette

North Myrtle Beach, SC

Professor, Political Science, SCC

Associate, Sociology, Coastal Carolina University, South Carolina

74 posted on 03/25/2005 5:30:01 AM PST by kjenerette (Jenerette for Senate - www.jenerette.com - U.S. Army Desert Storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk; Bear_Slayer
So you go ahead and stick up the local Kwiki Mart to get the money. It's the "right" thing to do, isn't it?

Only to someone who rejects the tenants of Natural Law. It is always wrong to steal, regardless of need and regardless of what the law says.

And it is always wrong to murder the innocent, regardless of need and regardless of what the law says.

75 posted on 03/25/2005 5:33:33 AM PST by jboot (Faith is not a work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: verity
No. This issue which has people really arguing and defining themselves -- will remain.

America has had is image destroyed around the world, too
all because of the American Mullahs.

76 posted on 03/25/2005 5:33:50 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: zippee
Excellent point, why demonize Jeb. He really is one of the good guys. Corrupt lawyers and judges are the major culprits here along with a demonic so-called husband that radically abuses his wife and gets away with it.

We have a corrupt legal system that desperately needs fixing.
77 posted on 03/25/2005 5:34:30 AM PST by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

my husband and I were talking last evening about how scary this situation is....we both asked what's next? Are they going to find a solution to the social security problem by exterminating everyone over 50 years of age? Some say that is ridiculous....but my retort to that is....the Jews during WWII thought that nothing was going to happen....


78 posted on 03/25/2005 5:36:02 AM PST by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: politeia
there is no medical, legal or moral reason to not attempt a trial of natural drinking

Exactly. Instead her family is stripped searched to make sure they are not sneaking anything into her room. I couldn't even watch rats die like that, but I am getting hardened to watching Greer, Felos and Mikey die like that. Especially Greer. He is legally blind. He should be ordered to starve to death for his disability.

79 posted on 03/25/2005 5:36:48 AM PST by PistolPaknMama (Will work for cool tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
You have been in a barrel too long.

This will blow over.

80 posted on 03/25/2005 5:37:11 AM PST by verity (The Liberal Media and the ACLU are America's Enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson