[Jim Robinson]

I don't think this is MD4Bush. We can probably rule out about half of the general population and this lady is one. Course, I would have no idea if they were working in concert. Not saying or even hinting they were, just have no idea. Some reporter mentioned in an article a few weeks ago that certain emails were circulated from mddems.org. Doubt the investigation can go there, but that'd probably be a good place to start if they could. I think it should be obvious to all that MD4Bush was a Democrat politcial operative. A dirty tricks communications specialist so to speak.

[mr.sarcastic]

So what do we have to do to get someone to subpoena this information from you? As a Marylander, I'd love to see the Dems exposed.... that will make working on Ehrlich's re-election campaign all the more fun.

[conservative in nyc]

Mddems.org found out from someone that the Washington Post was going forward with their anti-NCPAC article. It could have been from the O'Malley administration. O'Malley was likely asked for comment on the rumor that he was having an affair with the anchorwoman before the story hit the press. Or it could have been from MD4Bush, for all we know. Like the identity of MD4Bush, we just don't know how mddems.org got the inside info on the story before it hit the press. Any investigation should definitely go there.

[GOP_1900AD]

Verrrrry interesting!