To: fork
I understand your loyalty. I first worked with Apple on the Lisa. But the reality is, any networked systems, be they Apple or Intel/AMD based can't match the raw power of a mainframe. The networked systems are a curiosity. Just do the math, how many bits can you shovel down a T1 line? Compare that to a Cray 1024 bit wide parallel bus running at say 500MHz. Now that is shoveling shi!t. And without being insulting when was the last time you worked with an interleaved memory system?
FWIW, the most powerful computers are not even on the list.
33 posted on
03/24/2005 8:49:41 PM PST by
ProudVet77
(It's boogitty boogitty boogitty season!)
To: ProudVet77
Aye, theoretical top performance can be quite different from sustained performance on real-world problems.
Partitioning your data grid can be a pain, as well as the issues of communication latency.
Full Disclosure: NEC Earth Simulator is still vector-based.
Second disclosure: For "embarassingly parallel" or "near embarassingly parallel" (Monte Carlo, massive searches, among others) the Blue Gene type is the way to go. But there was just something so--classy--about the Cray chassis.
Cheers!
42 posted on
03/24/2005 9:10:26 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson