I wasn't.
I am simply observing what the law says about who gets to decide.
Michael Schiavo gets to make the decision according to the law.
It's obviously not that clear cut otherwise it would not have taken this long. Second, there are people who are willing to stand up and say that she should live. Third, there is conflicting medical evidence about whether or not she can recover. In the midst of such a haze, you are so bloody happy to say she ought to die, rather than having a bias that she should live.
The haze around this case should give pause, not cause her to be starved to death.
Ivan