You don't KNOW what Terri wants. We have two conflicting statements. One from her husband who says she wants to die. One from her parents, who say she wants to live. The bias in such cases is being rewritten in favour of death, and by a very painful means - through forced starvation and dehydration. As has been said elsewhere, even death row inmates get more consideration.
You are comfortable with this? You think this is OK? Good God, why?
Ivan
No I'm not comfortable with this!
But there is no "bias" being rewritten, the existing law is being executed!
The law is finding in favor of Terri's guardian, and that's Michael.
We have executed innocent men in Florida's electric chair...do we now overturn the death sentence based on the REAL possibility of another innocent man being executed?
Are you comfortable turning over the right to make such intimate decisions on the life and death of your spouse or children to mob rule and politician?
Wrong on that point.
The Schindlers have testified they would try to keep her alive even if she'd made it clear to them that she would not want to continue in her condition. Therefore since I know how they feel I think Mike is the one doing what she wished.