Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Time4Atlas2Shrug

"And the neurologist that you claim to be incredible (boy everyone is!!) is a Nobel Prize nominee - not exactly considered a hack."

I have seen this posted elsewhere - I think there may be a problem with this claim:

Each year there are 100 to 250 nominees for each prize. It should be noted that the expression "nominated for a Nobel Prize," when used to establish someone's credentials or expertise in a certain field, is not an essentially meaningless expression. Although anyone can be nominated, not anyone can nominate anyone else for a Nobel Prize. For example the website of the Nobel Foundation (http://nobelprize.org/) says that in the case of the peace prize the following people may nominate:

Members of national assemblies and governments of states
Members of international courts
University rectors
Professors of social sciences, history, philosophy, law and theology
Directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy institutes
Persons who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
Board members of organizations who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
Active and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee
Former advisers appointed by the Norwegian Nobel Institute

...the Nobel Prize nominees are not publicly announced and they are not supposed to be told that they were ever considered for the prize. The records are sealed for 50 years. This is done to avoid turning the awarding of the prize into a popularity contest. Due to this secrecy it is questionable whenever someone uses a Nobel nomination as a qualification (how could you check it?).


564 posted on 03/24/2005 10:01:21 AM PST by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: stormer

Yes, I have since read that it was a congressman who nominated him. What a bad choice for a witness when there are others they could have chosen.


567 posted on 03/24/2005 10:41:15 AM PST by Time4Atlas2Shrug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies ]

To: stormer
the Nobel Prize nominees are not publicly announced and they are not supposed to be told that they were ever considered for the prize. The records are sealed for 50 years. This is done to avoid turning the awarding of the prize into a popularity contest. Due to this secrecy it is questionable whenever someone uses a Nobel nomination as a qualification (how could you check it?)

I don't know about that. I knew, personally, someone who was nominated but the prize went to someone else. Ten years after the fact, there was still a lot of bitterness over not getting the prize. At least in science, when someone gets a Nobel prize, other people familiar with the research (doing similar research themselves) know pretty much who else was considered.

583 posted on 03/24/2005 6:40:55 PM PST by exDemMom (Euthanasia, NO WAY. Youth in Asia, OF COURSE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson