To: steve-b
Our differences would probably lie in how we define social freedom. I would define it as the freedom to do what you ought -- freedom under God. You probably don't like that definition.
262 posted on
03/23/2005 11:44:23 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
I would define it as the freedom to do what you ought As this is literally an Orwellian definition (the totalitarian state of Nineteen Eighty-Four defined "freedom" as obedience to Big Brother), I cannot possibly take it seriously.
267 posted on
03/23/2005 12:02:17 PM PST by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson