It's in one of the links below; I don't expect you to go read the links and am asking a freeper who will remember exactly which document it's in and will let you know. I've forgotten which document it is.
Then, read:
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder11-02.txt
Greer's ruling in 2002 after the 5 doctor trial to see if there were any hope for her to improve.
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/2D02-5394.pdf
The Second district court of appeals' (interesting) ruling in support of his decision.
And the Wolfson Report, which gives the most thorough history:
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/wolfson%27s%20report.pdf
(Her parents asked him to be re-instated. Both sides trusted him. he's the main voice of sanity here, I think.
And he was convinced, as were the other three guardian ad litems, that Terri was PVS.
Terri's medical discharge summary:
http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Humana%20Discharge%20Summary%20050990.pdf
Report of Guardian ad litem Richard Pearse, who was relieved after 6 months when it was discovered that he had a previously stated personal objections to legalizing the removal of patient feeding tubes:
http://www.hospicepatients.org/richard-pearse-jr-12-29-98-report-of-guardianadlitem-re-terri-schiavo.pdf
(BTW, he also believed Terri was PVS)
And just for kicks:
Greer's denial of bone scan - the doctors who actually saw Terri, and the radiologist who did follow-up x-rays saw nothing suspicious.
http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/trialctorder11-02-scan.pdf
Greer's finding that Carla Iyer and others were not credible:
http://www.terrisfight.org/documents/Order%20Denying%20Pet%20Immed%20Ther%20091703.pdf
Description of the complete 4 hours of video:
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/10/Tampabay/Schiavo_tapes__snippe.shtml
Description of the testimony at the 2000 trial to determine Terri's wishes.
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/11/08/Tampabay/Schiavo_s_wishes_reca.shtml
NATIONAL ENQUIRER 1998 featuring Dr. William Hammesfahr (he has ads there)
http://www.floridaneurologicalinstitute.com/national_enquirer_1998.htm
More links at http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/infopage.html
and http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo_project.htm
Thanks, appreciate the links, I'll dig around. And hey, with regard to that removal of the guardian ad litem, how come he can be removed for bias but Cranford gets to stand as an expert witness, considering he's on record for backing feeding tube removal in all patients all the time?
thanks for the post...the hospital discharge summary painted a very bleak picture even then.