Skip to comments.
Russia's Sukhoi to develop 5th generation fighter jet.
pravda.ru ^
| 03/23/2005
Posted on 03/23/2005 8:40:27 AM PST by lizol
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
03/23/2005 8:40:42 AM PST
by
lizol
To: Grzegorz 246
I know you like such toys.
2
posted on
03/23/2005 8:41:34 AM PST
by
lizol
To: lizol
Looks like an X wing fighter in that picture.
3
posted on
03/23/2005 8:42:51 AM PST
by
Mr.Clark
(From the darkness....I shall come)
To: Mr.Clark
X wing???
Which is?
4
posted on
03/23/2005 8:45:45 AM PST
by
lizol
To: lizol
No stealth systems - easy meat for an AMRAAM. So much for that idea.
5
posted on
03/23/2005 8:45:58 AM PST
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: lizol
Hey our plans from 1985 have been ripped off!
6
posted on
03/23/2005 8:46:23 AM PST
by
Sax
To: lizol
Forward-swept wings make for a very twitchy aircraft. Not very stable at high speeds, but can turn on a dime. Combined with vectored-thrust engines, this thing will be a dogfighter extraordinaire. Missles will have a hard time hitting it if they can be detected in time, because this thing will be able to out-turn them all day long.
7
posted on
03/23/2005 8:47:20 AM PST
by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: lizol
Now that they've undoubtedly stolen the plans to the "Raptor,F-22", and seen it fly, the Russians now need to get to work builing a cheap knock-off.
8
posted on
03/23/2005 8:50:07 AM PST
by
Finalapproach29er
(Open borders=National suicide)
To: lizol
In 1976 we looked at a SFW version of the F-16. Probably didn't have the computer technology advanced enough to assist in controlling the flight.
9
posted on
03/23/2005 8:52:06 AM PST
by
Sax
To: Sax
10
posted on
03/23/2005 8:54:11 AM PST
by
lizol
To: lizol
Russia has a fabled history of aircraft design.
I recall seeing the big bad bear while flying well above the artic circle in my KC-97....It was a fabulous long range recon aircraft of it's day.
To: Little Pig
12
posted on
03/23/2005 8:57:21 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
To: lizol
X-Wing fighter:
13
posted on
03/23/2005 9:00:10 AM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: Doohickey
14
posted on
03/23/2005 9:02:55 AM PST
by
lizol
To: lizol
X wing was a 4 blade helicopter that would stop the blades with two forward and two backward.
the forward swept wing was an X (experimental) plane built by Grumman, using an F-5 forward fuselage.
The Luftwaffe developed a foward swept wing aircraft back in 1945, 18 degrees forward sweep, as I remember. Nothing new under the sun.
The X-31 had paddles to deflect the exhaust. Gave great maneuverability, but we aren't fighting with guns anymore. A highly maneuverable missile with a lethal warhead only has to get close. You don't have to intercept and track, you just have to point.
Some network centered warfare aspects are also making life more complex for fighters.
15
posted on
03/23/2005 9:03:29 AM PST
by
donmeaker
(Burn the UN flag publicly.)
To: lizol
I cannot believe they did not choose 1.42/1.44 as the platform. 1.42/1.44 was probably the only one that ever made it close to the abilities of F/A-22. Forward swept wings were thought to be not as attracting as it was to be for its ability. Well, I think they won't succeed that much with a fighter that may be too expensive.
16
posted on
03/23/2005 9:07:24 AM PST
by
Wiz
To: Paleo Conservative
17
posted on
03/23/2005 9:07:59 AM PST
by
Wiz
To: lizol
Yes. I think the original poster was making a joke.
18
posted on
03/23/2005 9:12:22 AM PST
by
Doohickey
("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
To: Sax
Bent bill most likely sold the plans or Kennedy traded them for a case of scotch.
19
posted on
03/23/2005 9:14:49 AM PST
by
Fast1
(Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart)
To: Fast1
What'd think they got for our Space Shuttle plans?
20
posted on
03/23/2005 9:22:41 AM PST
by
Sax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson