Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's Sukhoi to develop 5th generation fighter jet.
pravda.ru ^ | 03/23/2005

Posted on 03/23/2005 8:40:27 AM PST by lizol

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2005 8:40:42 AM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

I know you like such toys.


2 posted on 03/23/2005 8:41:34 AM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Looks like an X wing fighter in that picture.


3 posted on 03/23/2005 8:42:51 AM PST by Mr.Clark (From the darkness....I shall come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark
X wing???
Which is?
4 posted on 03/23/2005 8:45:45 AM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lizol

No stealth systems - easy meat for an AMRAAM. So much for that idea.


5 posted on 03/23/2005 8:45:58 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Hey our plans from 1985 have been ripped off! Image hosted by TinyPic.com
6 posted on 03/23/2005 8:46:23 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Forward-swept wings make for a very twitchy aircraft. Not very stable at high speeds, but can turn on a dime. Combined with vectored-thrust engines, this thing will be a dogfighter extraordinaire. Missles will have a hard time hitting it if they can be detected in time, because this thing will be able to out-turn them all day long.


7 posted on 03/23/2005 8:47:20 AM PST by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Now that they've undoubtedly stolen the plans to the "Raptor,F-22", and seen it fly, the Russians now need to get to work builing a cheap knock-off.


8 posted on 03/23/2005 8:50:07 AM PST by Finalapproach29er (Open borders=National suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol
In 1976 we looked at a SFW version of the F-16. Probably didn't have the computer technology advanced enough to assist in controlling the flight. Image hosted by TinyPic.com
9 posted on 03/23/2005 8:52:06 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

So this is the X-wing?


10 posted on 03/23/2005 8:54:11 AM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Russia has a fabled history of aircraft design.

I recall seeing the big bad bear while flying well above the artic circle in my KC-97....It was a fabulous long range recon aircraft of it's day.

11 posted on 03/23/2005 8:56:22 AM PST by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

12 posted on 03/23/2005 8:57:21 AM PST by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lizol
X-Wing fighter:


13 posted on 03/23/2005 9:00:10 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

Like in the Star Wars?


14 posted on 03/23/2005 9:02:55 AM PST by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lizol

X wing was a 4 blade helicopter that would stop the blades with two forward and two backward.

the forward swept wing was an X (experimental) plane built by Grumman, using an F-5 forward fuselage.

The Luftwaffe developed a foward swept wing aircraft back in 1945, 18 degrees forward sweep, as I remember. Nothing new under the sun.

The X-31 had paddles to deflect the exhaust. Gave great maneuverability, but we aren't fighting with guns anymore. A highly maneuverable missile with a lethal warhead only has to get close. You don't have to intercept and track, you just have to point.

Some network centered warfare aspects are also making life more complex for fighters.


15 posted on 03/23/2005 9:03:29 AM PST by donmeaker (Burn the UN flag publicly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lizol

I cannot believe they did not choose 1.42/1.44 as the platform. 1.42/1.44 was probably the only one that ever made it close to the abilities of F/A-22. Forward swept wings were thought to be not as attracting as it was to be for its ability. Well, I think they won't succeed that much with a fighter that may be too expensive.


16 posted on 03/23/2005 9:07:24 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Ping


17 posted on 03/23/2005 9:07:59 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Yes. I think the original poster was making a joke.


18 posted on 03/23/2005 9:12:22 AM PST by Doohickey ("This is a hard and dirty war, but when it's over, nothing will ever be too difficult again.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sax

Bent bill most likely sold the plans or Kennedy traded them for a case of scotch.


19 posted on 03/23/2005 9:14:49 AM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fast1
What'd think they got for our Space Shuttle plans? Image hosted by TinyPic.com
20 posted on 03/23/2005 9:22:41 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson